Verfassungsvergleichung heute : der schwierige Abschied vom ptolemäischen Weltbild
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
The article analyses the problems and challenges of constitutional comparativism today. It describes the reasons for the persistence of legal Ptolemaicism which focuses exclusively on national law and continues to dominate most of constitutional law scholarship. In Ger-many, particular reasons and circumstances have frustrated the development of an impor-tant comparative constitutional law scholarship, e.g. the strong practical orientation of legal education and legal scholarship and the introverted fascination with the Basic Law and constitutional jurisprudence. The article goes on to describe the practical and theoretical purposes of constitutional comparativism. It underlines that one of the main theoretical purposes of comparative law is to enable the national lawyer to look at his own constitutional law in a fresh, distanced, alienated way. As comparison always consists in the analy-sis of differences and similarities, it is not surprising that comparatists usually fall prey to two competing ideologies which the article terms the ideology of similarity and the ideology of difference. While the ideology of similarity has traditionally prevailed in most of private law comparative scholarship, it is also gaining ground in constitutional comparativism due to the influence of European Integration which tends to favour the search for common ground among the constitutions of the Member States. However, the theoreticians of difference may help us to remain sensible to the different historical and cultural contexts even if the texts Start to resemble each other more and more. Instead of choosing between the two ideological orientations, comparativism should learn from both in order to remain attentive simultaneously to the similarities and the differences between the constitutional Systems at hand. Comparative constitutionalism might then become the basis for a modern constitutional theory whose modeis and typologies could in turn deepen future comparative law scholarship.
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
SCHÖNBERGER, Christoph, 2010. Verfassungsvergleichung heute : der schwierige Abschied vom ptolemäischen Weltbild. In: Verfassung und Recht in Übersee : (VRÜ). 2010, 43(1), pp. 6-27. ISSN 0506-7286BibTex
@article{Schonberger2010Verfa-15245, year={2010}, title={Verfassungsvergleichung heute : der schwierige Abschied vom ptolemäischen Weltbild}, number={1}, volume={43}, issn={0506-7286}, journal={Verfassung und Recht in Übersee : (VRÜ)}, pages={6--27}, author={Schönberger, Christoph} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/15245"> <dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Schönberger, Christoph</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <dc:creator>Schönberger, Christoph</dc:creator> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Ersch. in: Verfassung und Recht in Übersee : (VRÜ) ; 43 (2010), 1. - S. 6-27</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/15245"/> <dc:language>deu</dc:language> <dcterms:title>Verfassungsvergleichung heute : der schwierige Abschied vom ptolemäischen Weltbild</dcterms:title> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-10-17T09:35:30Z</dcterms:available> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-10-17T09:35:30Z</dc:date> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>