Publikation:

Effect of narrative reports about vaccine adverse events and bias-awareness disclaimers on vaccine decisions : A simulation of an online patient social network

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2013

Autor:innen

Betsch, Cornelia
Renkewitz, Frank

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Medical Decision Making. 2013, 33(1), pp. 14-25. ISSN 0272-989X. eISSN 1552-681X. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0272989X12452342

Zusammenfassung

BACKGROUND: As the number of individuals who search for health information in interactive online environments is increasing, patient networks deserve more scientific attention.
OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively examine if and how reading statistical and/or narrative information as typically displayed in patient networks (e.g., patientslikeme.com) affects decisions for pharmaceuticals. Previous work suggests that narrative information (e.g., about vaccine adverse events, VAE) affects risk perceptions and intentions. The authors compare the effect of narrative and statistical information about VAE on vaccination decisions and examine if a disclaimer reduces the narrative bias as well as if low numeracy leads to increased use of the narratives.
METHOD AND DESIGN: In an online experiment, 458 participants were randomly assigned to a 3 (relative frequency of vaccine adverse events in 1, 7, or 17 of 20 cases) × 3 (type of information: narratives, summary statistics, or both) × 2 (bias awareness v. control disclaimer) between-subjects design. Measurements. Perceived risk, vaccination intention, and subjective numeracy.
RESULTS: A higher relative frequency of cases reporting VAE decreased the intention to get vaccinated. This relation was mediated by increased risk perception. The type of information moderated the contents' impact: Summary statistics had the smallest impact, whereas narrative information was more influential, and the presence of both types of information had the greatest impact on risk perception. Individuals who received the bias-awareness disclaimer were less influenced by the patient network. Highly numerate individuals were generally more sensitive to the provided information independent of its format.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient networks can influence vaccination decisions by delivering risk-related information. Disclaimers may help to reduce the influence if desired.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

Internet, Online Social Networking, Preventive Health Behavior, Decision Making, Vaccination

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BETSCH, Cornelia, Frank RENKEWITZ, Niels HAASE, 2013. Effect of narrative reports about vaccine adverse events and bias-awareness disclaimers on vaccine decisions : A simulation of an online patient social network. In: Medical Decision Making. 2013, 33(1), pp. 14-25. ISSN 0272-989X. eISSN 1552-681X. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0272989X12452342
BibTex
@article{Betsch2013Effec-41681,
  year={2013},
  doi={10.1177/0272989X12452342},
  title={Effect of narrative reports about vaccine adverse events and bias-awareness disclaimers on vaccine decisions : A simulation of an online patient social network},
  number={1},
  volume={33},
  issn={0272-989X},
  journal={Medical Decision Making},
  pages={14--25},
  author={Betsch, Cornelia and Renkewitz, Frank and Haase, Niels}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/41681">
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">BACKGROUND: As the number of individuals who search for health information in interactive online environments is increasing, patient networks deserve more scientific attention.&lt;br /&gt;OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively examine if and how reading statistical and/or narrative information as typically displayed in patient networks (e.g., patientslikeme.com) affects decisions for pharmaceuticals. Previous work suggests that narrative information (e.g., about vaccine adverse events, VAE) affects risk perceptions and intentions. The authors compare the effect of narrative and statistical information about VAE on vaccination decisions and examine if a disclaimer reduces the narrative bias as well as if low numeracy leads to increased use of the narratives.&lt;br /&gt;METHOD AND DESIGN: In an online experiment, 458 participants were randomly assigned to a 3 (relative frequency of vaccine adverse events in 1, 7, or 17 of 20 cases) × 3 (type of information: narratives, summary statistics, or both) × 2 (bias awareness v. control disclaimer) between-subjects design. Measurements. Perceived risk, vaccination intention, and subjective numeracy.&lt;br /&gt;RESULTS: A higher relative frequency of cases reporting VAE decreased the intention to get vaccinated. This relation was mediated by increased risk perception. The type of information moderated the contents' impact: Summary statistics had the smallest impact, whereas narrative information was more influential, and the presence of both types of information had the greatest impact on risk perception. Individuals who received the bias-awareness disclaimer were less influenced by the patient network. Highly numerate individuals were generally more sensitive to the provided information independent of its format.&lt;br /&gt;CONCLUSIONS: Patient networks can influence vaccination decisions by delivering risk-related information. Disclaimers may help to reduce the influence if desired.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Haase, Niels</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Effect of narrative reports about vaccine adverse events and bias-awareness disclaimers on vaccine decisions : A simulation of an online patient social network</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Haase, Niels</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-03-05T07:52:20Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-03-05T07:52:20Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Betsch, Cornelia</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Betsch, Cornelia</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Renkewitz, Frank</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Renkewitz, Frank</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/41681"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen