REACH out-numbered! : The future of REACH and animal numbers
| dc.contributor.author | Rovida, Costanza | |
| dc.contributor.author | Busquet, Francois | |
| dc.contributor.author | Leist, Marcel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hartung, Thomas | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-08T14:36:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-08-08T14:36:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The EU’s REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) Regulation requires animal testing only as a last resort. However, our study (Knight et al., 2023) in this issue reveals that approximately 2.9 million animals have been used for REACH testing for reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, and repeated-dose toxicity alone as of December 2022. Currently, additional tests requiring about 1.3 million more animals are in the works. As compliance checks continue, more animal tests are anticipated. According to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), 75% of read-across methods have been rejected during compliance checks. Here, we estimate that 0.6 to 3.2 million animals have been used for other endpoints, likely at the lower end of this range. The ongoing discussion about the grouping of 4,500 registered petrochemicals can still have a major impact on these numbers. The 2022 amendment of REACH is estimated to add 3.6 to 7.0 million animals. This information comes as the European Parliament is set to consider changes to REACH that could further increase animal testing. Two proposals currently under discussion would likely necessitate new animal testing: extending the requirement for a chemical safety assessment (CSA) to Annex VII substances could add 1.6 to 2.6 million animals, and the registration of polymers adds a challenge comparable to the petrochemical discussion. These findings highlight the importance of understanding the current state of REACH animal testing for the upcoming debate on REACH revisions as an opportunity to focus on reducing animal use. | |
| dc.description.version | published | deu |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.14573/altex.2307121 | |
| dc.identifier.ppn | 1854791206 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/67539 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.rights | terms-of-use | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/ | |
| dc.subject.ddc | 570 | |
| dc.title | REACH out-numbered! : The future of REACH and animal numbers | eng |
| dc.type | JOURNAL_ARTICLE | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| kops.citation.bibtex | @article{Rovida2023REACH-67539,
year={2023},
doi={10.14573/altex.2307121},
title={REACH out-numbered! : The future of REACH and animal numbers},
number={3},
volume={40},
issn={1868-596X},
journal={Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX},
pages={367--388},
author={Rovida, Costanza and Busquet, Francois and Leist, Marcel and Hartung, Thomas}
} | |
| kops.citation.iso690 | ROVIDA, Costanza, Francois BUSQUET, Marcel LEIST, Thomas HARTUNG, 2023. REACH out-numbered! : The future of REACH and animal numbers. In: Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. Springer. 2023, 40(3), pp. 367-388. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.2307121 | deu |
| kops.citation.iso690 | ROVIDA, Costanza, Francois BUSQUET, Marcel LEIST, Thomas HARTUNG, 2023. REACH out-numbered! : The future of REACH and animal numbers. In: Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. Springer. 2023, 40(3), pp. 367-388. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.2307121 | eng |
| kops.citation.rdf | <rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/67539">
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dc:contributor>Leist, Marcel</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:abstract>The EU’s REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) Regulation requires animal testing only as a last resort. However, our study (Knight et al., 2023) in this issue reveals that approximately 2.9 million animals have been used for REACH testing for reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, and repeated-dose toxicity alone as of December 2022. Currently, additional tests requiring about 1.3 million more animals are in the works. As compliance checks continue, more animal tests are anticipated. According to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), 75% of read-across methods have been rejected during compliance checks. Here, we estimate that 0.6 to 3.2 million animals have been used for other endpoints, likely at the lower end of this range. The ongoing discussion about the grouping of 4,500 registered petrochemicals can still have a major impact on these numbers. The 2022 amendment of REACH is estimated to add 3.6 to 7.0 million animals. This information comes as the European Parliament is set to consider changes to REACH that could further increase animal testing. Two proposals currently under discussion would likely necessitate new animal testing: extending the requirement for a chemical safety assessment (CSA) to Annex VII substances could add 1.6 to 2.6 million animals, and the registration of polymers adds a challenge comparable to the petrochemical discussion. These findings highlight the importance of understanding the current state of REACH animal testing for the upcoming debate on REACH revisions as an opportunity to focus on reducing animal use.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:creator>Busquet, Francois</dc:creator>
<dcterms:title>REACH out-numbered! : The future of REACH and animal numbers</dcterms:title>
<dc:creator>Rovida, Costanza</dc:creator>
<dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/67539"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/67539/1/Rovida_2-y83fauqoewfx3.pdf"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-08-08T14:36:53Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Leist, Marcel</dc:creator>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:creator>Hartung, Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Hartung, Thomas</dc:contributor>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dc:contributor>Rovida, Costanza</dc:contributor>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/67539/1/Rovida_2-y83fauqoewfx3.pdf"/>
<dc:contributor>Busquet, Francois</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-08-08T14:36:53Z</dcterms:available>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> | |
| kops.description.funding | {"first": "eu", "second": "101057014"} | |
| kops.description.funding | {"first": "eu", "second": "963845"} | |
| kops.description.funding | {"first": "eu", "second": "964537"} | |
| kops.description.openAccess | openaccessgold | |
| kops.flag.isPeerReviewed | true | |
| kops.flag.knbibliography | true | |
| kops.identifier.nbn | urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-y83fauqoewfx3 | |
| kops.relation.euProjectID | 964537 | |
| kops.relation.euProjectID | 963845 | |
| kops.relation.euProjectID | 101057014 | |
| kops.relation.uniknProjectTitle | RISK-HUNT3R | |
| kops.sourcefield | Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. Springer. 2023, <b>40</b>(3), pp. 367-388. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.2307121 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. Springer. 2023, 40(3), pp. 367-388. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.2307121 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. Springer. 2023, 40(3), pp. 367-388. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.2307121 | eng |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 05208daa-5345-4489-a200-87d350d8fca7 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | d166cc79-683e-4b5f-b4a0-8ccdd3d02bbc | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 36e501e4-b8aa-46a8-9514-4a52792e3f9a | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 05208daa-5345-4489-a200-87d350d8fca7 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage | 367 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.issue | 3 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.toPage | 388 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.volume | 40 | |
| source.identifier.eissn | 1868-8551 | |
| source.identifier.issn | 1868-596X | |
| source.periodicalTitle | Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX | |
| source.publisher | Springer | |
| temp.internal.duplicates | items/9c47c591-7866-4c80-99a8-c4564a5839f7;true;Food for Thought : Read-across approaches – misconceptions, promises and challenges ahead | |
| temp.internal.duplicates | items/98cce1ba-ff95-4cc9-8339-27172bd577db;true;Can TTIP Improve Laboratory Animal Welfare in Safety Testing and 3Rs? | |
| temp.internal.duplicates | items/5d66d531-9ca3-40f0-b1af-1f4312604e32;true;Interactive Ambiguity Resolution of Named Entities in Fictional Literature | |
| temp.internal.duplicates | items/2e3e2cdc-5388-43dd-825d-fcee54eef191;true;Intra- and interspecific variation in self-control capacities of parrots in a delay of gratification task | |
| temp.internal.duplicates | items/91a93468-3220-4054-89a6-6798e059f674;true;“To do or not to do” : a review on actor-related affordance judgments |
Dateien
Originalbündel
1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
- Name:
- Rovida_2-y83fauqoewfx3.pdf
- Größe:
- 1.45 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
Lizenzbündel
1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
- Name:
- license.txt
- Größe:
- 3.96 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Beschreibung:

