REACH out-numbered! : The future of REACH and animal numbers

dc.contributor.authorRovida, Costanza
dc.contributor.authorBusquet, Francois
dc.contributor.authorLeist, Marcel
dc.contributor.authorHartung, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-08T14:36:53Z
dc.date.available2023-08-08T14:36:53Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractThe EU’s REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) Regulation requires animal testing only as a last resort. However, our study (Knight et al., 2023) in this issue reveals that approximately 2.9 million animals have been used for REACH testing for reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, and repeated-dose toxicity alone as of December 2022. Currently, additional tests requiring about 1.3 million more animals are in the works. As compliance checks continue, more animal tests are anticipated. According to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), 75% of read-across methods have been rejected during compliance checks. Here, we estimate that 0.6 to 3.2 million animals have been used for other endpoints, likely at the lower end of this range. The ongoing discussion about the grouping of 4,500 regis­tered petrochemicals can still have a major impact on these numbers. The 2022 amendment of REACH is estimated to add 3.6 to 7.0 million animals. This information comes as the European Parliament is set to consider changes to REACH that could further increase animal testing. Two proposals currently under discussion would likely necessitate new animal testing: extending the requirement for a chemical safety assessment (CSA) to Annex VII substances could add 1.6 to 2.6 million animals, and the registration of polymers adds a challenge comparable to the petrochemical discussion. These findings high­light the importance of understanding the current state of REACH animal testing for the upcoming debate on REACH revisions as an opportunity to focus on reducing animal use.
dc.description.versionpublisheddeu
dc.identifier.doi10.14573/altex.2307121
dc.identifier.ppn1854791206
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/67539
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsterms-of-use
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subject.ddc570
dc.titleREACH out-numbered! : The future of REACH and animal numberseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLE
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Rovida2023REACH-67539,
  year={2023},
  doi={10.14573/altex.2307121},
  title={REACH out-numbered! : The future of REACH and animal numbers},
  number={3},
  volume={40},
  issn={1868-596X},
  journal={Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX},
  pages={367--388},
  author={Rovida, Costanza and Busquet, Francois and Leist, Marcel and Hartung, Thomas}
}
kops.citation.iso690ROVIDA, Costanza, Francois BUSQUET, Marcel LEIST, Thomas HARTUNG, 2023. REACH out-numbered! : The future of REACH and animal numbers. In: Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. Springer. 2023, 40(3), pp. 367-388. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.2307121deu
kops.citation.iso690ROVIDA, Costanza, Francois BUSQUET, Marcel LEIST, Thomas HARTUNG, 2023. REACH out-numbered! : The future of REACH and animal numbers. In: Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. Springer. 2023, 40(3), pp. 367-388. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.2307121eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/67539">
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Leist, Marcel</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract>The EU’s REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) Regulation requires animal testing only as a last resort. However, our study (Knight et al., 2023) in this issue reveals that approximately 2.9 million animals have been used for REACH testing for reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, and repeated-dose toxicity alone as of December 2022. Currently, additional tests requiring about 1.3 million more animals are in the works. As compliance checks continue, more animal tests are anticipated. According to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), 75% of read-across methods have been rejected during compliance checks. Here, we estimate that 0.6 to 3.2 million animals have been used for other endpoints, likely at the lower end of this range. The ongoing discussion about the grouping of 4,500 regis­tered petrochemicals can still have a major impact on these numbers. The 2022 amendment of REACH is estimated to add 3.6 to 7.0 million animals. This information comes as the European Parliament is set to consider changes to REACH that could further increase animal testing. Two proposals currently under discussion would likely necessitate new animal testing: extending the requirement for a chemical safety assessment (CSA) to Annex VII substances could add 1.6 to 2.6 million animals, and the registration of polymers adds a challenge comparable to the petrochemical discussion. These findings high­light the importance of understanding the current state of REACH animal testing for the upcoming debate on REACH revisions as an opportunity to focus on reducing animal use.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Busquet, Francois</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>REACH out-numbered! : The future of REACH and animal numbers</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Rovida, Costanza</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/67539"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/67539/1/Rovida_2-y83fauqoewfx3.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-08-08T14:36:53Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Leist, Marcel</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Hartung, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Hartung, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Rovida, Costanza</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/67539/1/Rovida_2-y83fauqoewfx3.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Busquet, Francois</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-08-08T14:36:53Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.funding{"first": "eu", "second": "101057014"}
kops.description.funding{"first": "eu", "second": "963845"}
kops.description.funding{"first": "eu", "second": "964537"}
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgold
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrue
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-y83fauqoewfx3
kops.relation.euProjectID964537
kops.relation.euProjectID963845
kops.relation.euProjectID101057014
kops.relation.uniknProjectTitleRISK-HUNT3R
kops.sourcefieldAlternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. Springer. 2023, <b>40</b>(3), pp. 367-388. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.2307121deu
kops.sourcefield.plainAlternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. Springer. 2023, 40(3), pp. 367-388. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.2307121deu
kops.sourcefield.plainAlternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. Springer. 2023, 40(3), pp. 367-388. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.2307121eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication05208daa-5345-4489-a200-87d350d8fca7
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd166cc79-683e-4b5f-b4a0-8ccdd3d02bbc
relation.isAuthorOfPublication36e501e4-b8aa-46a8-9514-4a52792e3f9a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery05208daa-5345-4489-a200-87d350d8fca7
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage367
source.bibliographicInfo.issue3
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage388
source.bibliographicInfo.volume40
source.identifier.eissn1868-8551
source.identifier.issn1868-596X
source.periodicalTitleAlternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX
source.publisherSpringer
temp.internal.duplicatesitems/9c47c591-7866-4c80-99a8-c4564a5839f7;true;Food for Thought : Read-across approaches – misconceptions, promises and challenges ahead
temp.internal.duplicatesitems/98cce1ba-ff95-4cc9-8339-27172bd577db;true;Can TTIP Improve Laboratory Animal Welfare in Safety Testing and 3Rs?
temp.internal.duplicatesitems/5d66d531-9ca3-40f0-b1af-1f4312604e32;true;Interactive Ambiguity Resolution of Named Entities in Fictional Literature
temp.internal.duplicatesitems/2e3e2cdc-5388-43dd-825d-fcee54eef191;true;Intra- and interspecific variation in self-control capacities of parrots in a delay of gratification task
temp.internal.duplicatesitems/91a93468-3220-4054-89a6-6798e059f674;true;“To do or not to do” : a review on actor-related affordance judgments

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Rovida_2-y83fauqoewfx3.pdf
Größe:
1.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Rovida_2-y83fauqoewfx3.pdf
Rovida_2-y83fauqoewfx3.pdfGröße: 1.45 MBDownloads: 172

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
3.96 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 3.96 KBDownloads: 0