Publikation:

Summary and Validation of New Animal-Free Toxicity Tests

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Leist_256469.pdf
Leist_256469.pdfGröße: 152.96 KBDownloads: 88

Datum

2013

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

ALTEX Proceedings. 2013, 2(1), pp. 27-37. ISSN 2194-0479

Zusammenfassung

Alternatives to animal testing have been developed mainly in the fields of toxicology and vaccine testing. Typical examples are the evaluation of phototoxicity, eye irritation, or skin corrosion resulting from cosmetics and industrial chemicals. Examples also can be found in other biomedical areas, however, including the control of the quality of drug preparations or for the control of the production process of biologics. For regulatory purposes, the quality, transferability, and predictivity of an alternative method need to be evaluated. This procedure often is called the “validation process” of a new method. It follows defined rules, and several governmental institutions have been established to perform, supervise, or advise on this process. As this often results in a delay of method implementation, different alternatives for the evaluation of a method’s suitability and quality are subject to discussion. We describe here the principles of model development and quality control. We also give an overview of methods that have undergone validation. Strengths and shortcomings of traditional approaches are discussed, and new developments and challenges are outlined.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie

Schlagwörter

validation process, OECD test guidelines, ICCVAM, ECVAM, JaCVAM

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690LEIST, Marcel, Nina HASIWA, Mardas DANESHIAN, 2013. Summary and Validation of New Animal-Free Toxicity Tests. In: ALTEX Proceedings. 2013, 2(1), pp. 27-37. ISSN 2194-0479
BibTex
@article{Leist2013Summa-25646,
  year={2013},
  title={Summary and Validation of New Animal-Free Toxicity Tests},
  number={1},
  volume={2},
  issn={2194-0479},
  journal={ALTEX Proceedings},
  pages={27--37},
  author={Leist, Marcel and Hasiwa, Nina and Daneshian, Mardas}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/25646">
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-01-15T20:22:09Z</dcterms:available>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/25646"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Alternatives to animal testing have been developed mainly in the fields of toxicology and vaccine testing. Typical examples are the evaluation of phototoxicity, eye irritation, or skin corrosion resulting from cosmetics and industrial chemicals. Examples also can be found in other biomedical areas, however, including the control of the quality of drug preparations or for the control of the production process of biologics. For regulatory purposes, the quality, transferability, and predictivity of an alternative method need to be evaluated. This procedure often is called the “validation process” of a new method. It follows defined rules, and several governmental institutions have been established to perform, supervise, or advise on this process. As this often results in a delay of method implementation, different alternatives for the evaluation of a method’s suitability and quality are subject to discussion. We describe here the principles of model development and quality control. We also give an overview of methods that have undergone validation. Strengths and shortcomings of traditional approaches are discussed, and new developments and challenges are outlined.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Daneshian, Mardas</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/25646/2/Leist_256469.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Leist, Marcel</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:title>Summary and Validation of New Animal-Free Toxicity Tests</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Hasiwa, Nina</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:contributor>Hasiwa, Nina</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-01-15T20:22:09Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>ALTEX Proceedings ; 2 (2013), 1. - S. 27-37</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:contributor>Daneshian, Mardas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Leist, Marcel</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/25646/2/Leist_256469.pdf"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen