Publikation: Political ideology and environmentalism impair logical reasoning
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
People are more likely to think statements are valid when they agree with them than when they do not. We conducted four studies analyzing the interference of self-reported ideologies with performance in a syllogistic reasoning task. Study 1 established the task paradigm and demonstrated that participants’ political ideology affects syllogistic reasoning for syllogisms with political content but not politically irrelevant syllogisms. The preregistered Study 2 replicated the effect and showed that incentivizing accuracy did not alleviate these differences. Study 3 revealed that syllogistic reasoning is affected by ideology in the presence and absence of such bonus payments for correctly judging the conclusions’ logical validity. In Study 4, we observed similar effects regarding a different ideological orientation: environmentalism. Again, monetary bonuses did not attenuate these effects. Taken together, the results of four studies highlight the harm of ideology regarding people’s logical reasoning.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
KELLER, Lucas, Felix HAZELAAR, Peter M. GOLLWITZER, Gabriele OETTINGEN, 2024. Political ideology and environmentalism impair logical reasoning. In: Thinking & Reasoning. Taylor & Francis. 2024, 30(1), S. 79-108. ISSN 1354-6783. eISSN 1464-0708. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/13546783.2023.2200976BibTex
@article{Keller2024Polit-66932, title={Political ideology and environmentalism impair logical reasoning}, year={2024}, doi={10.1080/13546783.2023.2200976}, number={1}, volume={30}, issn={1354-6783}, journal={Thinking & Reasoning}, pages={79--108}, author={Keller, Lucas and Hazelaar, Felix and Gollwitzer, Peter M. and Oettingen, Gabriele} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/66932"> <dc:creator>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-05-17T07:05:16Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Keller, Lucas</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Oettingen, Gabriele</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/66932"/> <dc:contributor>Oettingen, Gabriele</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Hazelaar, Felix</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Keller, Lucas</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-05-17T07:05:16Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Hazelaar, Felix</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract>People are more likely to think statements are valid when they agree with them than when they do not. We conducted four studies analyzing the interference of self-reported ideologies with performance in a syllogistic reasoning task. Study 1 established the task paradigm and demonstrated that participants’ political ideology affects syllogistic reasoning for syllogisms with political content but not politically irrelevant syllogisms. The preregistered Study 2 replicated the effect and showed that incentivizing accuracy did not alleviate these differences. Study 3 revealed that syllogistic reasoning is affected by ideology in the presence and absence of such bonus payments for correctly judging the conclusions’ logical validity. In Study 4, we observed similar effects regarding a different ideological orientation: environmentalism. Again, monetary bonuses did not attenuate these effects. Taken together, the results of four studies highlight the harm of ideology regarding people’s logical reasoning.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:issued>2024</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:title>Political ideology and environmentalism impair logical reasoning</dcterms:title> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>