Publikation: Guidance for Good In Vitro Reporting Standards (GIVReSt) : A draft for stakeholder discussion and background documentation
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Reproducibility of cell culture experiments between laboratories needs to be improved by ensuring more complete reporting of methodology in scientific papers. The minimum reporting standards suggested here cover various cell culture methods including monolayers, stem cells, organoids, and microphysiological systems (MPS). The standards build on existing guidance like Good Cell Culture Practice (GCCP 2.0) and OECD test reporting guidelines on how to quality-assure in vitro work, focusing on transparency and completeness of reporting. Key elements to be reported include full details of cell source and identity, cell quality control and characterization, materials and reagents used, culture conditions and protocols, experimental design, data analysis, data availability, and legal and ethical aspects. For complex models, additional details need to be provided such as cell ratios, microenvironment conditions, functional characterization, etc. The guidance for Good In Vitro Reporting Standards (GIVReSt) is part of a broader initiative of evidence-based toxicology encompassing the improvement of the quality of in vitro studies for safety assessments and regulatory decisions. In summary, GIVReSt addresses incomplete reporting as a major factor affecting reproducibility of cell culture experiments by providing clear standards around transparency and rigor in reporting. The integration of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) is envisioned to streamline compliance checking, providing real-time feedback and accelerating scientific discovery by making high-quality evidence more accessible. This should lead to more reliable cell culture research overall.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
MOHAPATRA, Ronit, Marcel LEIST, Sonja von AULOCK, Thomas HARTUNG, 2025. Guidance for Good In Vitro Reporting Standards (GIVReSt) : A draft for stakeholder discussion and background documentation. In: Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. Springer. 2025, 42(3), S. 376-396. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.14573/altex.2507041BibTex
@article{Mohapatra2025Guida-74251,
title={Guidance for Good In Vitro Reporting Standards (GIVReSt) : A draft for stakeholder discussion and background documentation},
year={2025},
doi={10.14573/altex.2507041},
number={3},
volume={42},
issn={1868-596X},
journal={Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX},
pages={376--396},
author={Mohapatra, Ronit and Leist, Marcel and Aulock, Sonja von and Hartung, Thomas}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/74251">
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dc:contributor>Hartung, Thomas</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
<dcterms:issued>2025</dcterms:issued>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dc:creator>Leist, Marcel</dc:creator>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/74251"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-08-11T09:00:15Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Aulock, Sonja von</dc:creator>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/74251/4/Mohapatra_2-126wuqt9pgrcj1.pdf"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
<dc:creator>Hartung, Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Leist, Marcel</dc:contributor>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:title>Guidance for Good In Vitro Reporting Standards (GIVReSt) : A draft for stakeholder discussion and background documentation</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:abstract>Reproducibility of cell culture experiments between laboratories needs to be improved by ensuring more complete reporting of methodology in scientific papers. The minimum reporting standards suggested here cover various cell culture methods including monolayers, stem cells, organoids, and microphysiological systems (MPS). The standards build on existing guidance like Good Cell Culture Practice (GCCP 2.0) and OECD test reporting guidelines on how to quality-assure in vitro work, focusing on transparency and completeness of reporting. Key elements to be reported include full details of cell source and identity, cell quality control and characterization, materials and reagents used, culture conditions and protocols, experimental design, data analysis, data availability, and legal and ethical aspects. For complex models, additional details need to be provided such as cell ratios, microenvironment conditions, functional characterization, etc. The guidance for Good In Vitro Reporting Standards (GIVReSt) is part of a broader initiative of evidence-based toxicology encompassing the improvement of the quality of in vitro studies for safety assessments and regulatory decisions. In summary, GIVReSt addresses incomplete reporting as a major factor affecting reproducibility of cell culture experiments by providing clear standards around transparency and rigor in reporting. The integration of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) is envisioned to streamline compliance checking, providing real-time feedback and accelerating scientific discovery by making high-quality evidence more accessible. This should lead to more reliable cell culture research overall.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:contributor>Mohapatra, Ronit</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Mohapatra, Ronit</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Aulock, Sonja von</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-08-11T09:00:15Z</dcterms:available>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/74251/4/Mohapatra_2-126wuqt9pgrcj1.pdf"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>