Publikation:

The Care of the Self and Blind Variation: An Ethnography of the Empirical in Two Sciences

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Knorr_1995_CareOfSelf.pdf
Knorr_1995_CareOfSelf.pdfGröße: 10.14 MBDownloads: 495

Datum

1995

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

GALISON, P., ed., D. STUMP, ed.. The Disunity of Science Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Stanford: Univ. Pr., 1995

Zusammenfassung

In this paper, I want to present two stories about kinds of empiricism; about the ways a science, experimental high energy physics, understands and enacts empirical research, and about how this understanding differs from that of another science, molecular biology. An ethnography of the empirical in different sciences has never been written. One reason for this surely lies in the fact that the meaning of empirical procedure is thought to be common to all experimental sciences, describable in terms of a few injunctions, and spelled out in any textbook introduction to the respective field. By studying scientific laboratories, the new sociology of science overcame the textbook image of science11, but it did not break away from the assumption that all sciences conform to similar procedures, exemplify similar attitudes to the empirical world, and form part of one culture. It also focussed on the role played by contingencies, interpretation and negotiation in the creation of scientific knowledge. What got left out of the picture was the construction of the empirical machineries involved in this creation.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690KNORR, Karin, 1995. The Care of the Self and Blind Variation: An Ethnography of the Empirical in Two Sciences. In: GALISON, P., ed., D. STUMP, ed.. The Disunity of Science Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Stanford: Univ. Pr., 1995
BibTex
@incollection{Knorr1995Blind-11467,
  year={1995},
  title={The Care of the Self and Blind Variation: An Ethnography of the Empirical in Two Sciences},
  publisher={Univ. Pr.},
  address={Stanford},
  booktitle={The Disunity of Science Boundaries, Contexts, and Power},
  editor={Galison, P. and Stump, D.},
  author={Knorr, Karin}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/11467">
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:34:12Z</dcterms:available>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/11467/1/Knorr_1995_CareOfSelf.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:title>The Care of the Self and Blind Variation: An Ethnography of the Empirical in Two Sciences</dcterms:title>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/11467"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">In this paper, I want to present two stories about kinds of empiricism; about the ways a science, experimental high energy physics, understands and enacts empirical research, and about how this understanding differs from that of another science, molecular biology. An ethnography of the empirical in different sciences has never been written. One reason for this surely lies in the fact that the meaning of empirical procedure is thought to be common to all experimental sciences, describable in terms of a few injunctions, and spelled out in any textbook introduction to the respective field. By studying scientific laboratories, the new sociology of science overcame the textbook image of science11, but it did not break away from the assumption that all sciences conform to similar procedures, exemplify similar attitudes to the empirical world, and form part of one culture. It also focussed on the role played by contingencies, interpretation and negotiation in the creation of scientific knowledge. What got left out of the picture was the construction of the empirical machineries involved in this creation.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Knorr, Karin</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:34:12Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/11467/1/Knorr_1995_CareOfSelf.pdf"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: The Disunity of Science. Boundaries, Contexts, and Power / P. Galison and D. Stump (eds.). Stanford: Univ. Pr., 1995</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dcterms:issued>1995</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Knorr, Karin</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen