Physiological adaptations to chronic stress in healthy humans : why might the sexes have evolved different energy utilisation strategies?

dc.contributor.authorJones, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorPruessner, Jens C.
dc.contributor.authorMcMillan, Merlin R.
dc.contributor.authorJones, Russell W.
dc.contributor.authorKowalik, Grzegorz T.
dc.contributor.authorSteeden, Jennifer A.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Bryan
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Andrew M.
dc.contributor.authorMuthurangu, Vivek
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-28T13:10:03Z
dc.date.available2017-03-28T13:10:03Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-01eng
dc.description.abstractObesity and associated diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, are the dominant human health problems in the modern era. Humans develop these conditions partly because they consume excess energy and exercise too little. Stress might be one of the factors contributing to these disease-promoting behaviours. We postulate that sex-specific primordial energy optimisation strategies exist, which developed to help cope with chronic stress but have become maladaptive in modern societies, worsening health. To demonstrate the existence of these energy optimisation strategies, we recruited 88 healthy adults with varying adiposity and chronic stress exposure. Cardiovascular physiology at rest and during acute stress (Montreal Imaging Stress Task), and body fat distribution were measured using advanced magnetic resonance imaging methods, together with endocrine function, cardiovascular energy use and cognitive performance. Potential confounders such as lifestyle, social class and employment were accounted for. We found that women exposed to chronic stress had lower adiposity, greater acute stress cardiovascular responses and better cognitive performance. Conversely, chronic stress-exposed men had greater adiposity and lower cardiovascular responses to acute stress. These results provide initial support for our hypothesis that differing sex-specific energy conservation strategies exist. We propose that these strategies have initially evolved to benefit humans but are now maladaptive and increase the risk of disorders such as obesity, especially in men exposed to chronic stress.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1113/JP272021eng
dc.identifier.pmid27027401eng
dc.identifier.ppn1664575766
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/38175
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsterms-of-use
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subject.ddc150eng
dc.titlePhysiological adaptations to chronic stress in healthy humans : why might the sexes have evolved different energy utilisation strategies?eng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Jones2016-08-01Physi-38175,
  year={2016},
  doi={10.1113/JP272021},
  title={Physiological adaptations to chronic stress in healthy humans : why might the sexes have evolved different energy utilisation strategies?},
  number={15},
  volume={594},
  issn={0022-3751},
  journal={The Journal of Physiology},
  pages={4297--4307},
  author={Jones, Alexander and Pruessner, Jens C. and McMillan, Merlin R. and Jones, Russell W. and Kowalik, Grzegorz T. and Steeden, Jennifer A. and Williams, Bryan and Taylor, Andrew M. and Muthurangu, Vivek}
}
kops.citation.iso690JONES, Alexander, Jens C. PRUESSNER, Merlin R. MCMILLAN, Russell W. JONES, Grzegorz T. KOWALIK, Jennifer A. STEEDEN, Bryan WILLIAMS, Andrew M. TAYLOR, Vivek MUTHURANGU, 2016. Physiological adaptations to chronic stress in healthy humans : why might the sexes have evolved different energy utilisation strategies?. In: The Journal of Physiology. 2016, 594(15), pp. 4297-4307. ISSN 0022-3751. eISSN 1469-7793. Available under: doi: 10.1113/JP272021deu
kops.citation.iso690JONES, Alexander, Jens C. PRUESSNER, Merlin R. MCMILLAN, Russell W. JONES, Grzegorz T. KOWALIK, Jennifer A. STEEDEN, Bryan WILLIAMS, Andrew M. TAYLOR, Vivek MUTHURANGU, 2016. Physiological adaptations to chronic stress in healthy humans : why might the sexes have evolved different energy utilisation strategies?. In: The Journal of Physiology. 2016, 594(15), pp. 4297-4307. ISSN 0022-3751. eISSN 1469-7793. Available under: doi: 10.1113/JP272021eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38175">
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/38175/1/Jones_2-14cu3hepmyquy7.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Jones, Russell W.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Steeden, Jennifer A.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Muthurangu, Vivek</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-03-28T13:10:03Z</dcterms:available>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Jones, Alexander</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Williams, Bryan</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Jones, Russell W.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Taylor, Andrew M.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Williams, Bryan</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/38175"/>
    <dc:creator>Muthurangu, Vivek</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Pruessner, Jens C.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Pruessner, Jens C.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-03-28T13:10:03Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Obesity and associated diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, are the dominant human health problems in the modern era. Humans develop these conditions partly because they consume excess energy and exercise too little. Stress might be one of the factors contributing to these disease-promoting behaviours. We postulate that sex-specific primordial energy optimisation strategies exist, which developed to help cope with chronic stress but have become maladaptive in modern societies, worsening health. To demonstrate the existence of these energy optimisation strategies, we recruited 88 healthy adults with varying adiposity and chronic stress exposure. Cardiovascular physiology at rest and during acute stress (Montreal Imaging Stress Task), and body fat distribution were measured using advanced magnetic resonance imaging methods, together with endocrine function, cardiovascular energy use and cognitive performance. Potential confounders such as lifestyle, social class and employment were accounted for. We found that women exposed to chronic stress had lower adiposity, greater acute stress cardiovascular responses and better cognitive performance. Conversely, chronic stress-exposed men had greater adiposity and lower cardiovascular responses to acute stress. These results provide initial support for our hypothesis that differing sex-specific energy conservation strategies exist. We propose that these strategies have initially evolved to benefit humans but are now maladaptive and increase the risk of disorders such as obesity, especially in men exposed to chronic stress.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Steeden, Jennifer A.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Kowalik, Grzegorz T.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Jones, Alexander</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Physiological adaptations to chronic stress in healthy humans : why might the sexes have evolved different energy utilisation strategies?</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:issued>2016-08-01</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Taylor, Andrew M.</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>McMillan, Merlin R.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Kowalik, Grzegorz T.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>McMillan, Merlin R.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/38175/1/Jones_2-14cu3hepmyquy7.pdf"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgreen
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-14cu3hepmyquy7
kops.sourcefieldThe Journal of Physiology. 2016, <b>594</b>(15), pp. 4297-4307. ISSN 0022-3751. eISSN 1469-7793. Available under: doi: 10.1113/JP272021deu
kops.sourcefield.plainThe Journal of Physiology. 2016, 594(15), pp. 4297-4307. ISSN 0022-3751. eISSN 1469-7793. Available under: doi: 10.1113/JP272021deu
kops.sourcefield.plainThe Journal of Physiology. 2016, 594(15), pp. 4297-4307. ISSN 0022-3751. eISSN 1469-7793. Available under: doi: 10.1113/JP272021eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication153324a0-c321-4cfb-a112-90179871cd94
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery153324a0-c321-4cfb-a112-90179871cd94
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage4297eng
source.bibliographicInfo.issue15eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage4307eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume594eng
source.identifier.eissn1469-7793eng
source.identifier.issn0022-3751eng
source.periodicalTitleThe Journal of Physiologyeng

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Jones_2-14cu3hepmyquy7.pdf
Größe:
149.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Jones_2-14cu3hepmyquy7.pdf
Jones_2-14cu3hepmyquy7.pdfGröße: 149.42 KBDownloads: 263