Publikation: The Behavioral Validity of the Strategy Method in Public Good Experiments
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2012
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Journal of Economic Psychology. 2012, 33(4), pp. 897-913. ISSN 0167-4870. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2012.04.002
Zusammenfassung
We compare the strategy method and the direct response method in public good experiments in a within-subject design. This comparison is interesting because the strategy method is frequently used to investigate preference heterogeneity. We find that people identified by the strategy method as conditional cooperators also behave as conditional cooperators under the direct response method. Free-rider types contribute systematically less than all others. Overall, our results support the behavioral validity of the strategy method in public good experiments.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
330 Wirtschaft
Schlagwörter
Public goods experiments, Strategy method, Direct response method, Experimental methodology, Voluntary cooperation, Conditional cooperators, Free riders
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
FISCHBACHER, Urs, Simon GÄCHTER, Simone QUERCIA, 2012. The Behavioral Validity of the Strategy Method in Public Good Experiments. In: Journal of Economic Psychology. 2012, 33(4), pp. 897-913. ISSN 0167-4870. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2012.04.002BibTex
@article{Fischbacher2012Behav-21668, year={2012}, doi={10.1016/j.joep.2012.04.002}, title={The Behavioral Validity of the Strategy Method in Public Good Experiments}, number={4}, volume={33}, issn={0167-4870}, journal={Journal of Economic Psychology}, pages={897--913}, author={Fischbacher, Urs and Gächter, Simon and Quercia, Simone} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/21668"> <dc:contributor>Fischbacher, Urs</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Quercia, Simone</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>The Behavioral Validity of the Strategy Method in Public Good Experiments</dcterms:title> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">We compare the strategy method and the direct response method in public good experiments in a within-subject design. This comparison is interesting because the strategy method is frequently used to investigate preference heterogeneity. We find that people identified by the strategy method as conditional cooperators also behave as conditional cooperators under the direct response method. Free-rider types contribute systematically less than all others. Overall, our results support the behavioral validity of the strategy method in public good experiments.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Gächter, Simon</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:creator>Fischbacher, Urs</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Journal of Economic Psychology ; 33 (2012), 4. - S. 897-913</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/> <dc:creator>Quercia, Simone</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-02-12T07:55:03Z</dcterms:available> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/21668"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-02-12T07:55:03Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Gächter, Simon</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja