Gender Differences in Body Evaluation : Do Men Show More Self-Serving Double Standards Than Women?

dc.contributor.authorVoges, Mona M.
dc.contributor.authorGiabbiconi, Claire-Marie
dc.contributor.authorSchöne, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorWaldorf, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorHartmann, Andrea S.
dc.contributor.authorVocks, Silja
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-20T08:24:20Z
dc.date.available2021-10-20T08:24:20Z
dc.date.issued2019eng
dc.description.abstractGenerally speaking, compared to women, men are less dissatisfied with their own body and consider themselves to be better-looking and less overweight. So far, however, it is unclear whether these divergent body ratings arise from the application of double standards. With the present study, we examined whether men apply different standards to their own body than to other men's bodies and whether they differ from women in this regard. To this aim, we presented n = 104 women and n = 93 men with pictures of thin, average-weight, overweight, athletic and hypermuscular male and female bodies on a computer screen. To manipulate identification, we showed the bodies of the respective participant's gender once with the participant's own face and once with the face of another person. Identity cues, such as faces, might activate different body schemata, which influence body ratings and thus lead to the application of double standards. Participants were instructed to rate their emotional reaction to the bodies according to valence and arousal, and to rate the bodies with respect to attractiveness, body fat, and muscle mass. The application of double standards was determined by calculating the difference between the rating of a body presented with the participant's face and the rating of the same body presented with another person's face. Both women and men showed self-deprecating double standards in valence, body attractiveness, body fat and muscle mass for the overweight body. Men also revealed self-deprecating double standards for the thin, average-weight and hypermuscular bodies, but evaluated the athletic body as more attractive and with a higher positive feeling when it was presented with their own face. Women did not show any self-serving double standards and showed fewer self-deprecating double standards than men. The results indicate that men devalue non-ideal bodies and upvalue ideal bodies when they are self-related, whereas women more rate in a fair-minded manner. Thus, in contrast to women, an advantage for men may be that they are able to self-enhance in the case of desirable bodies. This ability to self-enhance regarding desirable features might be beneficial for men's self-worth and body satisfaction.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00544eng
dc.identifier.pmid30930819eng
dc.identifier.ppn1774574608
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55299
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc150eng
dc.titleGender Differences in Body Evaluation : Do Men Show More Self-Serving Double Standards Than Women?eng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Voges2019Gende-55299,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00544},
  title={Gender Differences in Body Evaluation : Do Men Show More Self-Serving Double Standards Than Women?},
  volume={10},
  journal={Frontiers in Psychology},
  author={Voges, Mona M. and Giabbiconi, Claire-Marie and Schöne, Benjamin and Waldorf, Manuel and Hartmann, Andrea S. and Vocks, Silja},
  note={Article Number: 544}
}
kops.citation.iso690VOGES, Mona M., Claire-Marie GIABBICONI, Benjamin SCHÖNE, Manuel WALDORF, Andrea S. HARTMANN, Silja VOCKS, 2019. Gender Differences in Body Evaluation : Do Men Show More Self-Serving Double Standards Than Women?. In: Frontiers in Psychology. Frontiers Research Foundation. 2019, 10, 544. eISSN 1664-1078. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00544deu
kops.citation.iso690VOGES, Mona M., Claire-Marie GIABBICONI, Benjamin SCHÖNE, Manuel WALDORF, Andrea S. HARTMANN, Silja VOCKS, 2019. Gender Differences in Body Evaluation : Do Men Show More Self-Serving Double Standards Than Women?. In: Frontiers in Psychology. Frontiers Research Foundation. 2019, 10, 544. eISSN 1664-1078. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00544eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55299">
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55299/3/Voges_2-15j8yo50knlvc6.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55299"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Generally speaking, compared to women, men are less dissatisfied with their own body and consider themselves to be better-looking and less overweight. So far, however, it is unclear whether these divergent body ratings arise from the application of double standards. With the present study, we examined whether men apply different standards to their own body than to other men's bodies and whether they differ from women in this regard. To this aim, we presented n = 104 women and n = 93 men with pictures of thin, average-weight, overweight, athletic and hypermuscular male and female bodies on a computer screen. To manipulate identification, we showed the bodies of the respective participant's gender once with the participant's own face and once with the face of another person. Identity cues, such as faces, might activate different body schemata, which influence body ratings and thus lead to the application of double standards. Participants were instructed to rate their emotional reaction to the bodies according to valence and arousal, and to rate the bodies with respect to attractiveness, body fat, and muscle mass. The application of double standards was determined by calculating the difference between the rating of a body presented with the participant's face and the rating of the same body presented with another person's face. Both women and men showed self-deprecating double standards in valence, body attractiveness, body fat and muscle mass for the overweight body. Men also revealed self-deprecating double standards for the thin, average-weight and hypermuscular bodies, but evaluated the athletic body as more attractive and with a higher positive feeling when it was presented with their own face. Women did not show any self-serving double standards and showed fewer self-deprecating double standards than men. The results indicate that men devalue non-ideal bodies and upvalue ideal bodies when they are self-related, whereas women more rate in a fair-minded manner. Thus, in contrast to women, an advantage for men may be that they are able to self-enhance in the case of desirable bodies. This ability to self-enhance regarding desirable features might be beneficial for men's self-worth and body satisfaction.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Voges, Mona M.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Schöne, Benjamin</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Waldorf, Manuel</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hartmann, Andrea S.</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55299/3/Voges_2-15j8yo50knlvc6.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Hartmann, Andrea S.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Giabbiconi, Claire-Marie</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Giabbiconi, Claire-Marie</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Vocks, Silja</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Waldorf, Manuel</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Schöne, Benjamin</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-20T08:24:20Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Voges, Mona M.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-20T08:24:20Z</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Vocks, Silja</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>Gender Differences in Body Evaluation : Do Men Show More Self-Serving Double Standards Than Women?</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgoldeng
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrueeng
kops.flag.knbibliographyfalse
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-15j8yo50knlvc6
kops.sourcefieldFrontiers in Psychology. Frontiers Research Foundation. 2019, <b>10</b>, 544. eISSN 1664-1078. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00544deu
kops.sourcefield.plainFrontiers in Psychology. Frontiers Research Foundation. 2019, 10, 544. eISSN 1664-1078. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00544deu
kops.sourcefield.plainFrontiers in Psychology. Frontiers Research Foundation. 2019, 10, 544. eISSN 1664-1078. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00544eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6ba48e67-0b89-41fa-8ccd-b57bd02ce171
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6ba48e67-0b89-41fa-8ccd-b57bd02ce171
source.bibliographicInfo.articleNumber544eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume10eng
source.identifier.eissn1664-1078eng
source.periodicalTitleFrontiers in Psychologyeng
source.publisherFrontiers Research Foundationeng

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Voges_2-15j8yo50knlvc6.pdf
Größe:
1.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Voges_2-15j8yo50knlvc6.pdf
Voges_2-15j8yo50knlvc6.pdfGröße: 1.09 MBDownloads: 189

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
3.96 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 3.96 KBDownloads: 0