'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : Dogmatic Framework and Conceptual Meaning

Breuer, Marten

'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : Dogmatic Framework and Conceptual Meaning

Dateien

Breuer_2-160irho0chh8q5.pdfGröße: 209.7 KBDownloads: 38

Datum

2019

Publikationstyp

Beitrag zu einem Sammelband

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

BREUER, Marten, ed.. Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?. Berlin: Springer, 2019, pp. 3-34. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht. 285. ISBN 978-3-662-58985-4. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_1

Zusammenfassung

Resistance of national judges to international court judgments has become more and more frequent and explicit in recent years. This chapter aims to portray the dogmatic framework within which this phenomenon takes place, namely, the principle of supremacy of international law. Beginning with examples from the ICJ and the CJEU, the chapter proceeds to the ECHR framework. Here, the main argument is that there are cases where non-execution is not the result of mere political unwillingness but where there is a legal conflict between the Convention and the national/constitutional identity, leading to a deadlock situation. Those cases are addressed as ‘principled resistance’ cases. The chapter concludes by giving reasons for scrutinizing certain countries and omitting others in the country reports section.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

340 Recht

Zitieren

ISO 690

BREUER, Marten, 2019. 'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : Dogmatic Framework and Conceptual Meaning. In: BREUER, Marten, ed.. Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?. Berlin: Springer, 2019, pp. 3-34. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht. 285. ISBN 978-3-662-58985-4. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_1

BibTex

@incollection{Breuer2019-07-18Princ-47195,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_1},
  title={'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : Dogmatic Framework and Conceptual Meaning},
  number={285},
  isbn={978-3-662-58985-4},
  publisher={Springer},
  address={Berlin},
  series={Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht},
  booktitle={Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?},
  pages={3--34},
  editor={Breuer, Marten},
  author={Breuer, Marten}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/47195">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/47195"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2019-07-18</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-10-11T09:39:11Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-10-11T09:39:11Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:title>'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : Dogmatic Framework and Conceptual Meaning</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Resistance of national judges to international court judgments has become more and more frequent and explicit in recent years. This chapter aims to portray the dogmatic framework within which this phenomenon takes place, namely, the principle of supremacy of international law. Beginning with examples from the ICJ and the CJEU, the chapter proceeds to the ECHR framework. Here, the main argument is that there are cases where non-execution is not the result of mere political unwillingness but where there is a legal conflict between the Convention and the national/constitutional identity, leading to a deadlock situation. Those cases are addressed as ‘principled resistance’ cases. The chapter concludes by giving reasons for scrutinizing certain countries and omitting others in the country reports section.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/47195/1/Breuer_2-160irho0chh8q5.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/47195/1/Breuer_2-160irho0chh8q5.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Breuer, Marten</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Breuer, Marten</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja