Publikation: 'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : Dogmatic Framework and Conceptual Meaning
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Resistance of national judges to international court judgments has become more and more frequent and explicit in recent years. This chapter aims to portray the dogmatic framework within which this phenomenon takes place, namely, the principle of supremacy of international law. Beginning with examples from the ICJ and the CJEU, the chapter proceeds to the ECHR framework. Here, the main argument is that there are cases where non-execution is not the result of mere political unwillingness but where there is a legal conflict between the Convention and the national/constitutional identity, leading to a deadlock situation. Those cases are addressed as ‘principled resistance’ cases. The chapter concludes by giving reasons for scrutinizing certain countries and omitting others in the country reports section.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BREUER, Marten, 2019. 'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : Dogmatic Framework and Conceptual Meaning. In: BREUER, Marten, ed.. Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?. Berlin: Springer, 2019, pp. 3-34. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht. 285. ISBN 978-3-662-58985-4. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_1BibTex
@incollection{Breuer2019-07-18Princ-47195, year={2019}, doi={10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_1}, title={'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : Dogmatic Framework and Conceptual Meaning}, number={285}, isbn={978-3-662-58985-4}, publisher={Springer}, address={Berlin}, series={Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht}, booktitle={Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?}, pages={3--34}, editor={Breuer, Marten}, author={Breuer, Marten} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/47195"> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/47195"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <dcterms:issued>2019-07-18</dcterms:issued> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-10-11T09:39:11Z</dc:date> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-10-11T09:39:11Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:title>'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : Dogmatic Framework and Conceptual Meaning</dcterms:title> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Resistance of national judges to international court judgments has become more and more frequent and explicit in recent years. This chapter aims to portray the dogmatic framework within which this phenomenon takes place, namely, the principle of supremacy of international law. Beginning with examples from the ICJ and the CJEU, the chapter proceeds to the ECHR framework. Here, the main argument is that there are cases where non-execution is not the result of mere political unwillingness but where there is a legal conflict between the Convention and the national/constitutional identity, leading to a deadlock situation. Those cases are addressed as ‘principled resistance’ cases. The chapter concludes by giving reasons for scrutinizing certain countries and omitting others in the country reports section.</dcterms:abstract> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/47195/1/Breuer_2-160irho0chh8q5.pdf"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/47195/1/Breuer_2-160irho0chh8q5.pdf"/> <dc:creator>Breuer, Marten</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Breuer, Marten</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>