Publikation:

How Do Survey Respondents Decide Whether to Consent to Data Linkage?

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2025

Autor:innen

Burton, Jonathan
Couper, Mick P.
Crossley, Thomas F.

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Sociological Methods & Research. Sage. ISSN 0049-1241. eISSN 1552-8294. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1177/00491241251344289

Zusammenfassung

Linkages between surveys and administrative data provide an important opportunity for social and health research, but such linkages often require the informed consent of respondents. We use experimental data collection across five different samples to study how consent decisions are made. More reflective decision processes are associated with higher rates of consent, greater comprehension of the proposed data linkage, and greater confidence in the decision, but only about a third of respondents report using a reflective decision process. This suggests that the provision of additional information is unlikely to lead to significant improvements in informed consent.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie

Schlagwörter

administrative data, decision process, experiments, record linkage, survey, questionnaire design

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BURTON, Jonathan, Mick P. COUPER, Thomas F. CROSSLEY, Annette JÄCKLE, Sandra WALZENBACH, 2025. How Do Survey Respondents Decide Whether to Consent to Data Linkage?. In: Sociological Methods & Research. Sage. ISSN 0049-1241. eISSN 1552-8294. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1177/00491241251344289
BibTex
@article{Burton2025-07-09Surve-74079,
  title={How Do Survey Respondents Decide Whether to Consent to Data Linkage?},
  year={2025},
  doi={10.1177/00491241251344289},
  issn={0049-1241},
  journal={Sociological Methods & Research},
  author={Burton, Jonathan and Couper, Mick P. and Crossley, Thomas F. and Jäckle, Annette and Walzenbach, Sandra}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/74079">
    <dcterms:title>How Do Survey Respondents Decide Whether to Consent to Data Linkage?</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dc:contributor>Jäckle, Annette</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2025-07-09</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/74079"/>
    <dcterms:abstract>Linkages between surveys and administrative data provide an important opportunity for social and health research, but such linkages often require the informed consent of respondents. We use experimental data collection across five different samples to study how consent decisions are made. More reflective decision processes are associated with higher rates of consent, greater comprehension of the proposed data linkage, and greater confidence in the decision, but only about a third of respondents report using a reflective decision process. This suggests that the provision of additional information is unlikely to lead to significant improvements in informed consent.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Walzenbach, Sandra</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Crossley, Thomas F.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Burton, Jonathan</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Burton, Jonathan</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Jäckle, Annette</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Walzenbach, Sandra</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-07-22T07:13:54Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Couper, Mick P.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Crossley, Thomas F.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-07-22T07:13:54Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Couper, Mick P.</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Online First: Zeitschriftenartikel, die schon vor ihrer Zuordnung zu einem bestimmten Zeitschriftenheft (= Issue) online gestellt werden. Online First-Artikel werden auf der Homepage des Journals in der Verlagsfassung veröffentlicht.
Diese Publikation teilen