Publikation: Is epistemic accessibility enough? : Same-sex marriage, tradition, and the Bible
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2020
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Routledge. 2020, 23(1), pp. 21-35. ISSN 1369-8230. eISSN 1743-8772. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13698230.2018.1487231
Zusammenfassung
In Liberalism’s Religion, Cécile Laborde argues that a liberal state has to be a justifiable state: state action can only be legitimate if it is publicly justified, that is, if it is based on accessible reasons. These accessible reasons, she argues, are reasons that can be understood by all citizens. She defends a purely epistemic conception of accessibility. On Laborde’s account, accessible reasons are identified by particular epistemic features, and not by their substantive content. In this paper, I argue that Laborde’s account of epistemic accessibility cannot deliver on its promise of public justification. To illustrate this argument, I examine the case of the prohibition of same-sex marriage and look at two potential reasons that could be used to justify this prohibition: the non-accessible reference to the Bible and the accessible appeal to the value of tradition.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik
Schlagwörter
Cécile Laborde, secularism, public justification, accessibility, same-sex marriage
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
BARDON, Aurélia, 2020. Is epistemic accessibility enough? : Same-sex marriage, tradition, and the Bible. In: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Routledge. 2020, 23(1), pp. 21-35. ISSN 1369-8230. eISSN 1743-8772. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13698230.2018.1487231BibTex
@article{Bardon2020-01-02epist-45174,
year={2020},
doi={10.1080/13698230.2018.1487231},
title={Is epistemic accessibility enough? : Same-sex marriage, tradition, and the Bible},
number={1},
volume={23},
issn={1369-8230},
journal={Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy},
pages={21--35},
author={Bardon, Aurélia}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45174">
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-02-23T11:58:13Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:issued>2020-01-02</dcterms:issued>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/45174"/>
<dc:contributor>Bardon, Aurélia</dc:contributor>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:creator>Bardon, Aurélia</dc:creator>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-02-23T11:58:13Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In Liberalism’s Religion, Cécile Laborde argues that a liberal state has to be a justifiable state: state action can only be legitimate if it is publicly justified, that is, if it is based on accessible reasons. These accessible reasons, she argues, are reasons that can be understood by all citizens. She defends a purely epistemic conception of accessibility. On Laborde’s account, accessible reasons are identified by particular epistemic features, and not by their substantive content. In this paper, I argue that Laborde’s account of epistemic accessibility cannot deliver on its promise of public justification. To illustrate this argument, I examine the case of the prohibition of same-sex marriage and look at two potential reasons that could be used to justify this prohibition: the non-accessible reference to the Bible and the accessible appeal to the value of tradition.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:title>Is epistemic accessibility enough? : Same-sex marriage, tradition, and the Bible</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Unbekannt
