Publikation: Negative Indefinites and Negative Concord
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Negative indefinites like nobody and nothing are traditionally analyzed as negative quantifiers. The crosslinguistic validity of this analysis is challenged by the phenomenon of negative concord, where negative indefinites co‐occur with other items expressing negation in the same clause and nevertheless the meaning of the sentence involves only one negation. After giving a short overview of the main patterns of negative concord, this chapter critically discusses the most influential approaches. The first type of analysis assumes that negative indefinites in negative concord languages are lexically ambiguous between inherently negative quantifiers and nonnegative indefinites. The second type of approach maintains the standard analysis of negative indefinites as negative quantifiers. The third line of approach holds that negative indefinites in negative concord languages are semantically nonnegative. These approaches either assume that negative indefinites in negative concord languages are negative polarity items or analyze the relation between negative indefinites and sentential negation as a form of syntactic agreement.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
PENKA, Doris, 2020. Negative Indefinites and Negative Concord. In: GUTZMANN, Daniel, ed., Cecile MEIER, ed., Lisa MATTHEWSON, ed. and others. The Wiley Blackwell companion to semantics. New York: Wiley, 2020, pp. 1-23. ISBN 978-1-118-78831-8. Available under: doi: 10.1002/9781118788516.sem095BibTex
@incollection{Penka2020Negat-53049,
year={2020},
doi={10.1002/9781118788516.sem095},
title={Negative Indefinites and Negative Concord},
isbn={978-1-118-78831-8},
publisher={Wiley},
address={New York},
booktitle={The Wiley Blackwell companion to semantics},
pages={1--23},
editor={Gutzmann, Daniel and Meier, Cecile and Matthewson, Lisa},
author={Penka, Doris}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/53049">
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:contributor>Penka, Doris</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued>
<dc:creator>Penka, Doris</dc:creator>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-03-01T14:36:47Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-03-01T14:36:47Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Negative indefinites like nobody and nothing are traditionally analyzed as negative quantifiers. The crosslinguistic validity of this analysis is challenged by the phenomenon of negative concord, where negative indefinites co‐occur with other items expressing negation in the same clause and nevertheless the meaning of the sentence involves only one negation. After giving a short overview of the main patterns of negative concord, this chapter critically discusses the most influential approaches. The first type of analysis assumes that negative indefinites in negative concord languages are lexically ambiguous between inherently negative quantifiers and nonnegative indefinites. The second type of approach maintains the standard analysis of negative indefinites as negative quantifiers. The third line of approach holds that negative indefinites in negative concord languages are semantically nonnegative. These approaches either assume that negative indefinites in negative concord languages are negative polarity items or analyze the relation between negative indefinites and sentential negation as a form of syntactic agreement.</dcterms:abstract>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/53049"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dcterms:title>Negative Indefinites and Negative Concord</dcterms:title>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
