Publikation:

The Anthropocene Working Group and the Global Debate Around a New Geological Epoch

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2025

Autor:innen

Bohle, Martin
Sklair, Leslie
Will, Fabienne

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

978-3-031-85174-2
Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Cham: Springer

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Monographie
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Zusammenfassung

This book examines the role of the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG) in public and scholarly discussions of the meaning of the Anthropocene proposal. The status of the Anthropocene, both as a geoscientific concept and as a cultural concept becoming increasingly familiar in the public sphere, has been highly controversial. While geoscientists focus on possible geological markers and periodisation, the social sciences, environmental humanities, and creative arts have taken up the Anthropocene as a cultural concept to make sense of the planetary environmental crisis and contemporary society. This book documents intra-, inter-, and transdisciplinary debates, particularly, although not limited to, how different scholarly disciplines have responded to the Anthropocene proposal. The authors analyse how the AWG has become the focal point of a debate that straddles the boundaries between academic disciplines and public perceptions of science. The AWG thus serves as a case of the globalisation of science in terms of the global interconnectedness of scientific disciplines and the cultural significance of the Anthropocene proposal.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie

Schlagwörter

Anthropocene, Scientific Organizations, Geosciences, Earth System Sciences, Environmental Humanities, Environmental Philosophy, Environmental Social Sciences, Epistemology, Nature, Knowledge Practices, SDG 13

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BOHLE, Martin, Boris HOLZER, Leslie SKLAIR, Fabienne WILL, 2025. The Anthropocene Working Group and the Global Debate Around a New Geological Epoch. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-031-85174-2
BibTex
@book{Bohle2025Anthr-72651,
  isbn={978-3-031-85174-2},
  publisher={Springer},
  title={The Anthropocene Working Group and the Global Debate Around a New Geological Epoch},
  year={2025},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-031-85175-9},
  address={Cham},
  author={Bohle, Martin and Holzer, Boris and Sklair, Leslie and Will, Fabienne}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/72651">
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Sklair, Leslie</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Will, Fabienne</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Sklair, Leslie</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract>This book examines the role of the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG) in public and scholarly discussions of the meaning of the Anthropocene proposal. The status of the Anthropocene, both as a geoscientific concept and as a cultural concept becoming increasingly familiar in the public sphere, has been highly controversial. While geoscientists focus on possible geological markers and periodisation, the social sciences, environmental humanities, and creative arts have taken up the Anthropocene as a cultural concept to make sense of the planetary environmental crisis and contemporary society. This book documents intra-, inter-, and transdisciplinary debates, particularly, although not limited to, how different scholarly disciplines have responded to the Anthropocene proposal. The authors analyse how the AWG has become the focal point of a debate that straddles the boundaries between academic disciplines and public perceptions of science. The AWG thus serves as a case of the globalisation of science in terms of the global interconnectedness of scientific disciplines and the cultural significance of the Anthropocene proposal.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Will, Fabienne</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-03-12T15:19:35Z</dcterms:available>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2025</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Bohle, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <dc:publisher>Springer</dc:publisher>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-03-12T15:19:35Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Holzer, Boris</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:publisher>Cham</dc:publisher>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/72651"/>
    <dc:contributor>Holzer, Boris</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Bohle, Martin</dc:creator>
    <bibo:issn>978-3-031-85174-2</bibo:issn>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dcterms:title>The Anthropocene Working Group and the Global Debate Around a New Geological Epoch</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen