Publikation: Modulation of the error-related negativity by response conflict
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
An arrow version of the Eriksen flanker task was employed to investigate the influence of conflict on the error-related negativity (ERN). The degree of conflict was modulated by varying the distance between flankers and the target arrow (CLOSE and FAR conditions). Error rates and reaction time data from a behavioral experiment were used to adapt a connectionist model of this task. This model was based on the conflict monitoring theory and simulated behavioral and event-related potential data. The computational model predicted an increased ERN amplitude in FAR incompatible (the low-conflict condition) compared to CLOSE incompatible errors (the high-conflict condition). A subsequent ERP experiment confirmed the model predictions. The computational model explains this finding with larger postresponse conflict in far trials. In addition, data and model predictions of the N2 and the LRP support the conflict interpretation of the ERN.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
DANIELMEIER, Claudia, Jan R. WESSEL, Marco STEINHAUSER, Markus ULLSPERGER, 2009. Modulation of the error-related negativity by response conflict. In: Psychophysiology. 2009, 46(6), pp. 1288-1298. Available under: doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00860.xBibTex
@article{Danielmeier2009Modul-1345, year={2009}, doi={10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00860.x}, title={Modulation of the error-related negativity by response conflict}, number={6}, volume={46}, journal={Psychophysiology}, pages={1288--1298}, author={Danielmeier, Claudia and Wessel, Jan R. and Steinhauser, Marco and Ullsperger, Markus} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/1345"> <dcterms:issued>2009</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Danielmeier, Claudia</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Ullsperger, Markus</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: Psychophysiology 46 (2009), 6, pp. 1288 -1298</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:contributor>Steinhauser, Marco</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T09:24:53Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Wessel, Jan R.</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Danielmeier, Claudia</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>Modulation of the error-related negativity by response conflict</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Wessel, Jan R.</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">An arrow version of the Eriksen flanker task was employed to investigate the influence of conflict on the error-related negativity (ERN). The degree of conflict was modulated by varying the distance between flankers and the target arrow (CLOSE and FAR conditions). Error rates and reaction time data from a behavioral experiment were used to adapt a connectionist model of this task. This model was based on the conflict monitoring theory and simulated behavioral and event-related potential data. The computational model predicted an increased ERN amplitude in FAR incompatible (the low-conflict condition) compared to CLOSE incompatible errors (the high-conflict condition). A subsequent ERP experiment confirmed the model predictions. The computational model explains this finding with larger postresponse conflict in far trials. In addition, data and model predictions of the N2 and the LRP support the conflict interpretation of the ERN.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Ullsperger, Markus</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T09:24:53Z</dc:date> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Steinhauser, Marco</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/1345"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>