Publikation: Explaining different pathways in higher education policy in Romania and the Czech Republic
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This article examines the differential development of higher education governance in two Central and Eastern European countries since 1989. In current discourse, the market‐oriented model of higher education governance has established itself as an anchor point towards which systems are gradually converging. At the same time international organisations, in particular the EU and OECD, are promoting the use of market‐oriented instruments to meet the demands of massification, the knowledge society and the transforming role of the state. As a result, Romania has shrugged off its historical pattern of state‐centred governance and control and rapidly converged on the market‐oriented model. The Czech Republic, however, has resisted trends towards marketisation and clung to its historically anchored model. The analysis aims to offer theoretical explanations based on historical institutionalism and organisational isomorphism for the divergent development of these two countries despite similar internal and external conditions and their tight integration into the Bologna Process.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
DOBBINS, Michael, 2011. Explaining different pathways in higher education policy in Romania and the Czech Republic. In: Comparative Education. Taylor & Francis. 2011, 47(2), pp. 223-245. ISSN 0305-0068. eISSN 1360-0486. Available under: doi: 10.1080/03050068.2011.555116BibTex
@article{Dobbins2011-06-14Expla-49798, year={2011}, doi={10.1080/03050068.2011.555116}, title={Explaining different pathways in higher education policy in Romania and the Czech Republic}, url={https://www.jstor.org/stable/23074644}, number={2}, volume={47}, issn={0305-0068}, journal={Comparative Education}, pages={223--245}, author={Dobbins, Michael} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/49798"> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-06-09T07:39:44Z</dcterms:available> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Dobbins, Michael</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>Dobbins, Michael</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-06-09T07:39:44Z</dc:date> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dcterms:issued>2011-06-14</dcterms:issued> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This article examines the differential development of higher education governance in two Central and Eastern European countries since 1989. In current discourse, the market‐oriented model of higher education governance has established itself as an anchor point towards which systems are gradually converging. At the same time international organisations, in particular the EU and OECD, are promoting the use of market‐oriented instruments to meet the demands of massification, the knowledge society and the transforming role of the state. As a result, Romania has shrugged off its historical pattern of state‐centred governance and control and rapidly converged on the market‐oriented model. The Czech Republic, however, has resisted trends towards marketisation and clung to its historically anchored model. The analysis aims to offer theoretical explanations based on historical institutionalism and organisational isomorphism for the divergent development of these two countries despite similar internal and external conditions and their tight integration into the Bologna Process.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:title>Explaining different pathways in higher education policy in Romania and the Czech Republic</dcterms:title> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/49798"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>