Publikation: Absolutely general knowledge
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2021
Autor:innen
Fraser, Rachel Elizabeth
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Wiley. 2021, 103(3), pp. 547-566. ISSN 0031-8205. eISSN 1933-1592. Available under: doi: 10.1111/phpr.12710
Zusammenfassung
There is extensive debate among contemporary philosophers about the possibility of absolutely unrestricted quantification; thus far, the debate been almost entirely logically and metaphysically focused. We argue for a third axis of evaluation: the epistemological. We defend absolutism on epistemological grounds, by showing that one prominent and attractive alternative to absolutism—schematism—is epistemologically unacceptable. First, we spell out and motivate an epistemological desideratum for theories of generality, a desideratum which is easily satisfied by absolutists. Second, we consider five ways the schematist might satisfy this desideratum. We argue that none of the five ways is successful.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
FRASER, Rachel Elizabeth, Beau Madison MOUNT, 2021. Absolutely general knowledge. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Wiley. 2021, 103(3), pp. 547-566. ISSN 0031-8205. eISSN 1933-1592. Available under: doi: 10.1111/phpr.12710BibTex
@article{Fraser2021-11Absol-56733, year={2021}, doi={10.1111/phpr.12710}, title={Absolutely general knowledge}, number={3}, volume={103}, issn={0031-8205}, journal={Philosophy and Phenomenological Research}, pages={547--566}, author={Fraser, Rachel Elizabeth and Mount, Beau Madison} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/56733"> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/56733"/> <dc:creator>Fraser, Rachel Elizabeth</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Mount, Beau Madison</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">There is extensive debate among contemporary philosophers about the possibility of absolutely unrestricted quantification; thus far, the debate been almost entirely logically and metaphysically focused. We argue for a third axis of evaluation: the epistemological. We defend absolutism on epistemological grounds, by showing that one prominent and attractive alternative to absolutism—schematism—is epistemologically unacceptable. First, we spell out and motivate an epistemological desideratum for theories of generality, a desideratum which is easily satisfied by absolutists. Second, we consider five ways the schematist might satisfy this desideratum. We argue that none of the five ways is successful.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Mount, Beau Madison</dc:creator> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dcterms:issued>2021-11</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:title>Absolutely general knowledge</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56733/3/Fraser_2-187mmvxzx3tpt5.pdf"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56733/3/Fraser_2-187mmvxzx3tpt5.pdf"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-03-03T10:33:16Z</dcterms:available> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-03-03T10:33:16Z</dc:date> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:contributor>Fraser, Rachel Elizabeth</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja