Publikation:

Public Trust, Path Dependence, and Powerful Interests : A Model for the Emergence of Ethics Measures

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2008

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Public Integrity. 2008, 10(1), pp. 11-36. ISSN 1099-9922. eISSN 1558-0989. Available under: doi: 10.2753/PIN1099-9922100102

Zusammenfassung

How can the seemingly contradictory trends of international convergence of ethical standards and persistent differences in the shape and quantity of ethics measures be explained? This article presents a framework that combines explanatory factors for both trends and shows that they can very plausibly coexist. The framework is based on the logic of a principal-agent relationship as applied to the democratic system of representation and accountability and on institutionalist considerations of path dependency. Empirical evidence is gained from a structured-focused comparison of two case studies—Germany and the United States—which are described systematically according to the elements of an ethics infrastructure. As a result, it can be shown that the international convergence of ethical standards is mediated by institutional path dependency and specific administrative and legal traditions.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BEHNKE, Nathalie, 2008. Public Trust, Path Dependence, and Powerful Interests : A Model for the Emergence of Ethics Measures. In: Public Integrity. 2008, 10(1), pp. 11-36. ISSN 1099-9922. eISSN 1558-0989. Available under: doi: 10.2753/PIN1099-9922100102
BibTex
@article{Behnke2008-01-25Publi-40531,
  year={2008},
  doi={10.2753/PIN1099-9922100102},
  title={Public Trust, Path Dependence, and Powerful Interests : A Model for the Emergence of Ethics Measures},
  number={1},
  volume={10},
  issn={1099-9922},
  journal={Public Integrity},
  pages={11--36},
  author={Behnke, Nathalie}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40531">
    <dcterms:title>Public Trust, Path Dependence, and Powerful Interests : A Model for the Emergence of Ethics Measures</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/40531"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-11-08T14:10:53Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Behnke, Nathalie</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-11-08T14:10:53Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:issued>2008-01-25</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Behnke, Nathalie</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">How can the seemingly contradictory trends of international convergence of ethical standards and persistent differences in the shape and quantity of ethics measures be explained? This article presents a framework that combines explanatory factors for both trends and shows that they can very plausibly coexist. The framework is based on the logic of a principal-agent relationship as applied to the democratic system of representation and accountability and on institutionalist considerations of path dependency. Empirical evidence is gained from a structured-focused comparison of two case studies—Germany and the United States—which are described systematically according to the elements of an ethics infrastructure. As a result, it can be shown that the international convergence of ethical standards is mediated by institutional path dependency and specific administrative and legal traditions.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen