The three cultural projects of modernity

dc.contributor.authorGiesen, Bernhard
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-31T14:39:22Zdeu
dc.date.available2011-10-31T14:39:22Zdeu
dc.date.issued2009deu
dc.description.abstractFrom its classical foundations to the height of its conceptual refinement sociological theory has been strongly imprinted with the Enlightenment paradigm of modernity. This vision of modernity aimed at transcending boundaries and breaking down traditional barriers of rank and privilege to give way to the cosmopolis of free and equal individuals and to the public use of reason. Contrasted to universal reason and rationality, the manifolds of local traditions were to survive only in protected areas, as exotic entertainment for tourists, as pieces in museums, as matter for vacations and weekends. Religion, l’infâme in Voltaire’s famous phrasing, was to recede from a powerful public ritual practice and an encompassing worldview to a private concern of consolation for those who lagged behind the vanguard of the Enlightenment. Like local traditions, it was doomed to fade away.eng
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.identifier.citationPubl. in: International Political Anthropology ; 2 (2009), 2. - S.239-250deu
dc.identifier.urihttp://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/15314
dc.language.isoengdeu
dc.legacy.dateIssued2011-10-31deu
dc.rightsterms-of-usedeu
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/deu
dc.subject.ddc300deu
dc.titleThe three cultural projects of modernityeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEdeu
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Giesen2009three-15314,
  year={2009},
  title={The three cultural projects of modernity},
  number={2},
  volume={2},
  issn={1974-7268},
  journal={International Political Anthropology},
  pages={239--250},
  author={Giesen, Bernhard}
}
kops.citation.iso690GIESEN, Bernhard, 2009. The three cultural projects of modernity. In: International Political Anthropology. 2009, 2(2), pp. 239-250. ISSN 1974-7268deu
kops.citation.iso690GIESEN, Bernhard, 2009. The three cultural projects of modernity. In: International Political Anthropology. 2009, 2(2), pp. 239-250. ISSN 1974-7268eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/15314">
    <dc:creator>Giesen, Bernhard</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Giesen, Bernhard</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/15314"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: International Political Anthropology ; 2 (2009), 2. - S.239-250</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dcterms:title>The three cultural projects of modernity</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">From its classical foundations to the height of its conceptual refinement sociological theory has been strongly imprinted with the Enlightenment paradigm of modernity. This vision of modernity aimed at transcending boundaries and breaking down traditional barriers of rank and privilege to give way to the cosmopolis of free and equal individuals and to the public use of reason. Contrasted to universal reason and rationality, the manifolds of local traditions were to survive only in protected areas, as exotic entertainment for tourists, as pieces in museums, as matter for vacations and weekends. Religion, l’infâme in Voltaire’s famous phrasing, was to recede from a powerful public ritual practice and an encompassing worldview to a private concern of consolation for those who lagged behind the vanguard of the Enlightenment. Like local traditions, it was doomed to fade away.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-10-31T14:39:22Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:issued>2009</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-10-31T14:39:22Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-153149deu
kops.sourcefieldInternational Political Anthropology. 2009, <b>2</b>(2), pp. 239-250. ISSN 1974-7268deu
kops.sourcefield.plainInternational Political Anthropology. 2009, 2(2), pp. 239-250. ISSN 1974-7268deu
kops.sourcefield.plainInternational Political Anthropology. 2009, 2(2), pp. 239-250. ISSN 1974-7268eng
kops.submitter.emailbernhard.giesen@uni-konstanz.dedeu
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa3be5e61-1f2e-426a-9dfa-89c5b2341046
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya3be5e61-1f2e-426a-9dfa-89c5b2341046
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage239
source.bibliographicInfo.issue2
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage250
source.bibliographicInfo.volume2
source.identifier.issn1974-7268deu
source.periodicalTitleInternational Political Anthropology

Dateien

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
1.92 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 1.92 KBDownloads: 0