Publikation:

Administrative Crisis Management & Public Perceptions

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Lenz_2-19nrrsazxxllo6.pdf
Lenz_2-19nrrsazxxllo6.pdfGröße: 5.28 MBDownloads: 202

Datum

2023

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Dissertation
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Zusammenfassung

This dissertation delineates two fundamental tensions that public administrations face in the crisis environment: the tension between bureaucratic vs adaptive crisis management practices and the tension between internal effectiveness and external legitimacy. During a crisis response, public administrations must decide whether to adhere to bureaucratic procedures or to move away from routine managerial activity and instead switch to riskier but promising courses of action, such as adaptation and flexibility. The first empirical paper of the dissertation conceptualizes and operationalizes organizational flexibility in crisis management and theorizes on explanatory factors for the variation in flexibility between agencies. However, while bureaucratic routines and procedures may impair the effectiveness of crisis management, they are also associated with critical features of legitimacy. Consequently, changes in administrative routines during the crisis response likely affect how legitimate the public perceives the crisis management process. Paper two and three examine the effects of crisis management practices on external perceptions. Paper two scrutinizes three prominent crisis management dilemmas regarding flexibility, inclusion, and resource redistribution and how citizens evaluate the different management alternatives regarding their legitimacy. In Paper three, the focus is moved to the legitimacy perceptions of volunteers, who interacted with local administrations during the crisis management process and have gained direct insight into the practices.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

crisis management, flexibility, public administration, legitimacy

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690LENZ, Alexa, 2023. Administrative Crisis Management & Public Perceptions [Dissertation]. Konstanz: University of Konstanz
BibTex
@phdthesis{Lenz2023Admin-66941,
  year={2023},
  title={Administrative Crisis Management & Public Perceptions},
  author={Lenz, Alexa},
  address={Konstanz},
  school={Universität Konstanz}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/66941">
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-05-22T11:27:30Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Lenz, Alexa</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:abstract>This dissertation delineates two fundamental tensions that public administrations face in the crisis environment: the tension between bureaucratic vs adaptive crisis management practices and the tension between internal effectiveness and external legitimacy. During a crisis response, public administrations must decide whether to adhere to bureaucratic procedures or to move away from routine managerial activity and instead switch to riskier but promising courses of action, such as adaptation and flexibility. The first empirical paper of the dissertation conceptualizes and operationalizes organizational flexibility in crisis management and theorizes on explanatory factors for the variation in flexibility between agencies. However, while bureaucratic routines and procedures may impair the effectiveness of crisis management, they are also associated with critical features of legitimacy. Consequently, changes in administrative routines during the crisis response likely affect how legitimate the public perceives the crisis management process. Paper two and three examine the effects of crisis management practices on external perceptions. Paper two scrutinizes three prominent crisis management dilemmas regarding flexibility, inclusion, and resource redistribution and how citizens evaluate the different management alternatives regarding their legitimacy. In Paper three, the focus is moved to the legitimacy perceptions of volunteers, who interacted with local administrations during the crisis management process and have gained direct insight into the practices.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Lenz, Alexa</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Administrative Crisis Management &amp; Public Perceptions</dcterms:title>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66941/4/Lenz_2-19nrrsazxxllo6.pdf"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66941/4/Lenz_2-19nrrsazxxllo6.pdf"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-05-22T11:27:30Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/66941"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

May 4, 2023
Hochschulschriftenvermerk
Konstanz, Univ., Diss., 2023
Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen