Publikation: Is the Error-related Negativity Amplitude Related to Error Detectability? : Evidence from Effects of Different Error Types
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2008
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2008, 20(12), pp. 2263-2273. Available under: doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20159
Zusammenfassung
The present study tested error detection theories of the error-related negativity (ERN) by investigating the relation between ERN amplitude and error detectability. To this end, ERN amplitudes were compared with a behavioral measure of error detectability across two different error types in a fourchoice flanker task. If an erroneous response was associated with the flankers, it was considered a flanker error, otherwise it was considered a nonflanker error. Two experiments revealed that, whereas detectability was better for nonflanker errors than for flanker errors, ERN amplitudes were larger for flanker errors than for nonflanker errors. Moreover, undetected errors led to strongly reduced ERN amplitudes relative to detected errors. These results suggest that, although error detection is necessary for an ERN to occur, the ERN amplitude is not related to error detectability but rather to error significance.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
MAIER, Martin E., Marco STEINHAUSER, Ronald HÜBNER, 2008. Is the Error-related Negativity Amplitude Related to Error Detectability? : Evidence from Effects of Different Error Types. In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2008, 20(12), pp. 2263-2273. Available under: doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20159BibTex
@article{Maier2008Error-10814,
year={2008},
doi={10.1162/jocn.2008.20159},
title={Is the Error-related Negativity Amplitude Related to Error Detectability? : Evidence from Effects of Different Error Types},
number={12},
volume={20},
journal={Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience},
pages={2263--2273},
author={Maier, Martin E. and Steinhauser, Marco and Hübner, Ronald}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/10814">
<dc:contributor>Hübner, Ronald</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The present study tested error detection theories of the error-related negativity (ERN) by investigating the relation between ERN amplitude and error detectability. To this end, ERN amplitudes were compared with a behavioral measure of error detectability across two different error types in a fourchoice flanker task. If an erroneous response was associated with the flankers, it was considered a flanker error, otherwise it was considered a nonflanker error. Two experiments revealed that, whereas detectability was better for nonflanker errors than for flanker errors, ERN amplitudes were larger for flanker errors than for nonflanker errors. Moreover, undetected errors led to strongly reduced ERN amplitudes relative to detected errors. These results suggest that, although error detection is necessary for an ERN to occur, the ERN amplitude is not related to error detectability but rather to error significance.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10814/1/Is_the_Error_related_Negativity.pdf"/>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10814/1/Is_the_Error_related_Negativity.pdf"/>
<dc:creator>Steinhauser, Marco</dc:creator>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/10814"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:22:53Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:creator>Maier, Martin E.</dc:creator>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 (2008), 12, pp. 2263-2273</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:creator>Hübner, Ronald</dc:creator>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:title>Is the Error-related Negativity Amplitude Related to Error Detectability? : Evidence from Effects of Different Error Types</dcterms:title>
<dc:contributor>Steinhauser, Marco</dc:contributor>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:22:53Z</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Maier, Martin E.</dc:contributor>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
