Publikation: Why is belief–action consistency so low? : The role of belief uncertainty
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2024
Autor:innen
Folli, Dominik
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. Elsevier. 2024, 227, 106722. ISSN 0167-2681. eISSN 1879-1751. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106722
Zusammenfassung
Experimental research typically shows that best-response rates are below what plausible error rates would suggest. We experimentally test the conjecture that observed action–belief inconsistencies are related to belief uncertainty. We rely on a belief-sampling model that has been highly successful in explaining behavior in multi-armed bandit problems and aggregate outcomes in games, markets, and surveys. Our data shows that inducing higher belief uncertainty leads more frequently to choices that are inconsistent with stated beliefs and – in an experiment directly testing the mechanism – to stochastic belief reports. The uncertainty–inconsistency relationship continues to hold when we control for error costs econometrically in several ways.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
330 Wirtschaft
Schlagwörter
Best response, Belief elicitation, Discoordination game, Knightian uncertainty, Errors, Elusive beliefs
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
WOLFF, Irenaeus, Dominik FOLLI, 2024. Why is belief–action consistency so low? : The role of belief uncertainty. In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. Elsevier. 2024, 227, 106722. ISSN 0167-2681. eISSN 1879-1751. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106722BibTex
@article{Wolff2024-11belie-70996,
year={2024},
doi={10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106722},
title={Why is belief–action consistency so low? : The role of belief uncertainty},
volume={227},
issn={0167-2681},
journal={Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization},
author={Wolff, Irenaeus and Folli, Dominik},
note={Article Number: 106722}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/70996">
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-10-18T06:36:23Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-10-18T06:36:23Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:contributor>Folli, Dominik</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Folli, Dominik</dc:creator>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/70996/4/Wolff_2-1a3lbmrkcwj229.pdf"/>
<dc:creator>Wolff, Irenaeus</dc:creator>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
<dc:contributor>Wolff, Irenaeus</dc:contributor>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:issued>2024-11</dcterms:issued>
<dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International</dc:rights>
<dcterms:abstract>Experimental research typically shows that best-response rates are below what plausible error rates would suggest. We experimentally test the conjecture that observed action–belief inconsistencies are related to belief uncertainty. We rely on a belief-sampling model that has been highly successful in explaining behavior in multi-armed bandit problems and aggregate outcomes in games, markets, and surveys. Our data shows that inducing higher belief uncertainty leads more frequently to choices that are inconsistent with stated beliefs and – in an experiment directly testing the mechanism – to stochastic belief reports. The uncertainty–inconsistency relationship continues to hold when we control for error costs econometrically in several ways.</dcterms:abstract>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/70996/4/Wolff_2-1a3lbmrkcwj229.pdf"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
<dcterms:title>Why is belief–action consistency so low? : The role of belief uncertainty</dcterms:title>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/70996"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Begutachtet
Ja
