Publikation: Kognitive Verzerrungen im forensischen Kontext : Zuverlässigere Risikobeurteilungen durch Debiasing?
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Although the validity of forensic risk assessment has been in the focus of academic research in forensic mental health for the last 40 to 50 years, the quality of such assessments is still only moderately satisfactory on average. On one hand, there have been numerous attempts to improve the quality of assessments by developing new instruments or revising the content criteria of existing instruments. On the other hand, significant findings from decision psychology regarding the effect of cognitive biases on processes of judging have hardly found their way into the scientific debate so far. Consequently, there is also a lack of in-depth consideration of measures that counteract cognitive biases by applying debiasing strategies. However, erroneous judgements in the field of forensic mental health can cause severe consequences for individuals as well as for society. Therefore, sound empirical examination of debiasing strategies and their relevance to improve the validity of risk assessment is strongly recommended.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
GERTH, Juliane, Marc GRAF, Michael A. WEBER, 2022. Kognitive Verzerrungen im forensischen Kontext : Zuverlässigere Risikobeurteilungen durch Debiasing?. In: Praxis der Rechtspsychologie. Deutscher Psychologen-Verlag. 2022, 32(1), pp. 69-89. ISSN 0939-9062BibTex
@article{Gerth2022Kogni-68229, year={2022}, title={Kognitive Verzerrungen im forensischen Kontext : Zuverlässigere Risikobeurteilungen durch Debiasing?}, number={1}, volume={32}, issn={0939-9062}, journal={Praxis der Rechtspsychologie}, pages={69--89}, author={Gerth, Juliane and Graf, Marc and Weber, Michael A.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/68229"> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/68229"/> <dc:contributor>Weber, Michael A.</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Graf, Marc</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Gerth, Juliane</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Gerth, Juliane</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-11-17T07:46:03Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Graf, Marc</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:creator>Weber, Michael A.</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>Kognitive Verzerrungen im forensischen Kontext : Zuverlässigere Risikobeurteilungen durch Debiasing?</dcterms:title> <dcterms:abstract>Although the validity of forensic risk assessment has been in the focus of academic research in forensic mental health for the last 40 to 50 years, the quality of such assessments is still only moderately satisfactory on average. On one hand, there have been numerous attempts to improve the quality of assessments by developing new instruments or revising the content criteria of existing instruments. On the other hand, significant findings from decision psychology regarding the effect of cognitive biases on processes of judging have hardly found their way into the scientific debate so far. Consequently, there is also a lack of in-depth consideration of measures that counteract cognitive biases by applying debiasing strategies. However, erroneous judgements in the field of forensic mental health can cause severe consequences for individuals as well as for society. Therefore, sound empirical examination of debiasing strategies and their relevance to improve the validity of risk assessment is strongly recommended.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:language>deu</dc:language> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-11-17T07:46:03Z</dcterms:available> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>