Publikation:

Kognitive Verzerrungen im forensischen Kontext : Zuverlässigere Risikobeurteilungen durch Debiasing?

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2022

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Praxis der Rechtspsychologie. Deutscher Psychologen-Verlag. 2022, 32(1), pp. 69-89. ISSN 0939-9062

Zusammenfassung

Although the validity of forensic risk assessment has been in the focus of academic research in forensic mental health for the last 40 to 50 years, the quality of such assessments is still only moderately satisfactory on average. On one hand, there have been numerous attempts to improve the quality of assessments by developing new instruments or revising the content criteria of existing instruments. On the other hand, significant findings from decision psychology regarding the effect of cognitive biases on processes of judging have hardly found their way into the scientific debate so far. Consequently, there is also a lack of in-depth consideration of measures that counteract cognitive biases by applying debiasing strategies. However, erroneous judgements in the field of forensic mental health can cause severe consequences for individuals as well as for society. Therefore, sound empirical examination of debiasing strategies and their relevance to improve the validity of risk assessment is strongly recommended.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690GERTH, Juliane, Marc GRAF, Michael A. WEBER, 2022. Kognitive Verzerrungen im forensischen Kontext : Zuverlässigere Risikobeurteilungen durch Debiasing?. In: Praxis der Rechtspsychologie. Deutscher Psychologen-Verlag. 2022, 32(1), pp. 69-89. ISSN 0939-9062
BibTex
@article{Gerth2022Kogni-68229,
  year={2022},
  title={Kognitive Verzerrungen im forensischen Kontext : Zuverlässigere Risikobeurteilungen durch Debiasing?},
  number={1},
  volume={32},
  issn={0939-9062},
  journal={Praxis der Rechtspsychologie},
  pages={69--89},
  author={Gerth, Juliane and Graf, Marc and Weber, Michael A.}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/68229">
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/68229"/>
    <dc:contributor>Weber, Michael A.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Graf, Marc</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Gerth, Juliane</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Gerth, Juliane</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-11-17T07:46:03Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Graf, Marc</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Weber, Michael A.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Kognitive Verzerrungen im forensischen Kontext : Zuverlässigere Risikobeurteilungen durch Debiasing?</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract>Although the validity of forensic risk assessment has been in the focus of academic research in forensic mental health for the last 40 to 50 years, the quality of such assessments is still only moderately satisfactory on average. On one hand, there have been numerous attempts to improve the quality of assessments by developing new instruments or revising the content criteria of existing instruments. On the other hand, significant findings from decision psychology regarding the effect of cognitive biases on processes of judging have hardly found their way into the scientific debate so far. Consequently, there is also a lack of in-depth consideration of measures that counteract cognitive biases by applying debiasing strategies. However, erroneous judgements in the field of forensic mental health can cause severe consequences for individuals as well as for society. Therefore, sound empirical examination of debiasing strategies and their relevance to improve the validity of risk assessment is strongly recommended.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:language>deu</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-11-17T07:46:03Z</dcterms:available>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Unbekannt
Diese Publikation teilen