Publikation: Margaret Atwood's Reception in Canada and the United States : A Comparative Analysis of North American Reviews of 'The Blind Assassin'
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Based on a large corpus of reviews from Canada and the USA and taking into account my recent large-scale study of the reception of Margaret Atwood’s earlier novels in both North American countries, this article investigates how the reviewer’s nationality and that of the review’s target audience factor into the reception of a writer’s works. This is exemplarily documented in a case study of Atwood’s novel The Blind Assassin (2000), published at the end of her middle creative period. What do the reviews focus on and are there any striking differences attributable to the national and cultural context the review was written in and for? Was the evaluative response to the novel in the two North American countries similar or did it deviate significantly?
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
NISCHIK, Reingard M., 2017. Margaret Atwood's Reception in Canada and the United States : A Comparative Analysis of North American Reviews of 'The Blind Assassin'. In: Contemporary Women's Writing. 2017, 11(3), pp. 354-372. ISSN 1754-1476. eISSN 1754-1484. Available under: doi: 10.1093/cww/vpx013BibTex
@article{Nischik2017-12-31Marga-44105, year={2017}, doi={10.1093/cww/vpx013}, title={Margaret Atwood's Reception in Canada and the United States : A Comparative Analysis of North American Reviews of 'The Blind Assassin'}, number={3}, volume={11}, issn={1754-1476}, journal={Contemporary Women's Writing}, pages={354--372}, author={Nischik, Reingard M.}, note={A correction has been published: https://doi.org/10.1093/cww/vpy011} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44105"> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-12-03T13:59:38Z</dcterms:available> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Nischik, Reingard M.</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:title>Margaret Atwood's Reception in Canada and the United States : A Comparative Analysis of North American Reviews of 'The Blind Assassin'</dcterms:title> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/> <dc:contributor>Nischik, Reingard M.</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/44105"/> <dcterms:issued>2017-12-31</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Based on a large corpus of reviews from Canada and the USA and taking into account my recent large-scale study of the reception of Margaret Atwood’s earlier novels in both North American countries, this article investigates how the reviewer’s nationality and that of the review’s target audience factor into the reception of a writer’s works. This is exemplarily documented in a case study of Atwood’s novel The Blind Assassin (2000), published at the end of her middle creative period. What do the reviews focus on and are there any striking differences attributable to the national and cultural context the review was written in and for? Was the evaluative response to the novel in the two North American countries similar or did it deviate significantly?</dcterms:abstract> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-12-03T13:59:38Z</dc:date> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>