Publikation:

Confronting Theories of European Integration : A Comparative Congruence Analysis of Veterinary Drug Regulations in Five Countries

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Sager_2-1bap4082mifk64.pdf
Sager_2-1bap4082mifk64.pdfGröße: 187.6 KBDownloads: 40

Datum

2014

Autor:innen

Sager, Fritz
Zollinger, Christine
Mavrot, Céline

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2014, 16(5), pp. 457-474. ISSN 1387-6988. eISSN 1572-5448. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13876988.2014.960244

Zusammenfassung

This study moves beyond current perspectives of European Union implementation research to paint a comprehensive picture of the fine-tuning of domestic regulations beyond compliance. It compares the hitherto unexplored veterinary drug regulations of four member states, France, Germany, Austria, and the United Kingdom, with those of the non-member Switzerland. It links causal mechanisms back to three differing theoretical assumptions about European integration. These theories are confronted using congruence analysis in a comparative case study design. Evidence is found for historical institutionalism and for the domestic politics hypothesis. The assumption of a neo-functionalist development of regulations is only weakly supported.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

European integration, historical institutionalism, neo-functionalism, domestic politics, congruence analysis, comparative case study design, veterinary drug regulations

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690SAGER, Fritz, Eva THOMANN, Christine ZOLLINGER, Céline MAVROT, 2014. Confronting Theories of European Integration : A Comparative Congruence Analysis of Veterinary Drug Regulations in Five Countries. In: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2014, 16(5), pp. 457-474. ISSN 1387-6988. eISSN 1572-5448. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13876988.2014.960244
BibTex
@article{Sager2014Confr-52258,
  year={2014},
  doi={10.1080/13876988.2014.960244},
  title={Confronting Theories of European Integration : A Comparative Congruence Analysis of Veterinary Drug Regulations in Five Countries},
  number={5},
  volume={16},
  issn={1387-6988},
  journal={Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice},
  pages={457--474},
  author={Sager, Fritz and Thomann, Eva and Zollinger, Christine and Mavrot, Céline}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52258">
    <dc:contributor>Thomann, Eva</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2014</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-04T10:14:19Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Sager, Fritz</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52258"/>
    <dc:contributor>Zollinger, Christine</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-04T10:14:19Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Thomann, Eva</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Mavrot, Céline</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Zollinger, Christine</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mavrot, Céline</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52258/1/Sager_2-1bap4082mifk64.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This study moves beyond current perspectives of European Union implementation research to paint a comprehensive picture of the fine-tuning of domestic regulations beyond compliance. It compares the hitherto unexplored veterinary drug regulations of four member states, France, Germany, Austria, and the United Kingdom, with those of the non-member Switzerland. It links causal mechanisms back to three differing theoretical assumptions about European integration. These theories are confronted using congruence analysis in a comparative case study design. Evidence is found for historical institutionalism and for the domestic politics hypothesis. The assumption of a neo-functionalist development of regulations is only weakly supported.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Sager, Fritz</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:title>Confronting Theories of European Integration : A Comparative Congruence Analysis of Veterinary Drug Regulations in Five Countries</dcterms:title>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52258/1/Sager_2-1bap4082mifk64.pdf"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Unbekannt
Diese Publikation teilen