Publikation: Confronting Theories of European Integration : A Comparative Congruence Analysis of Veterinary Drug Regulations in Five Countries
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This study moves beyond current perspectives of European Union implementation research to paint a comprehensive picture of the fine-tuning of domestic regulations beyond compliance. It compares the hitherto unexplored veterinary drug regulations of four member states, France, Germany, Austria, and the United Kingdom, with those of the non-member Switzerland. It links causal mechanisms back to three differing theoretical assumptions about European integration. These theories are confronted using congruence analysis in a comparative case study design. Evidence is found for historical institutionalism and for the domestic politics hypothesis. The assumption of a neo-functionalist development of regulations is only weakly supported.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
SAGER, Fritz, Eva THOMANN, Christine ZOLLINGER, Céline MAVROT, 2014. Confronting Theories of European Integration : A Comparative Congruence Analysis of Veterinary Drug Regulations in Five Countries. In: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2014, 16(5), pp. 457-474. ISSN 1387-6988. eISSN 1572-5448. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13876988.2014.960244BibTex
@article{Sager2014Confr-52258, year={2014}, doi={10.1080/13876988.2014.960244}, title={Confronting Theories of European Integration : A Comparative Congruence Analysis of Veterinary Drug Regulations in Five Countries}, number={5}, volume={16}, issn={1387-6988}, journal={Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice}, pages={457--474}, author={Sager, Fritz and Thomann, Eva and Zollinger, Christine and Mavrot, Céline} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52258"> <dc:contributor>Thomann, Eva</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2014</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-04T10:14:19Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Sager, Fritz</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52258"/> <dc:contributor>Zollinger, Christine</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-04T10:14:19Z</dc:date> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:creator>Thomann, Eva</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>Mavrot, Céline</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Zollinger, Christine</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Mavrot, Céline</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52258/1/Sager_2-1bap4082mifk64.pdf"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This study moves beyond current perspectives of European Union implementation research to paint a comprehensive picture of the fine-tuning of domestic regulations beyond compliance. It compares the hitherto unexplored veterinary drug regulations of four member states, France, Germany, Austria, and the United Kingdom, with those of the non-member Switzerland. It links causal mechanisms back to three differing theoretical assumptions about European integration. These theories are confronted using congruence analysis in a comparative case study design. Evidence is found for historical institutionalism and for the domestic politics hypothesis. The assumption of a neo-functionalist development of regulations is only weakly supported.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:contributor>Sager, Fritz</dc:contributor> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:title>Confronting Theories of European Integration : A Comparative Congruence Analysis of Veterinary Drug Regulations in Five Countries</dcterms:title> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52258/1/Sager_2-1bap4082mifk64.pdf"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>