Publikation: On Floating Conclusions
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2023
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Konferenzband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
MARANHÃO, Juliano, Hrsg., Clayton PETERSON, Hrsg., Christian STRASSER, Hrsg., Leendert VAN DER TORRE, Hrsg.. Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. Rickmansworth: College Publications, 2023, S. 199-215
Zusammenfassung
When there are two lines of argument that contradict each other but still end up with the same conclusion, this conclusion is called a floating conclusion. It is an open topic in skeptical defeasible reasoning if floating conclusions ought to be accepted. Interestingly, the answer seems to be changing for different examples. In this paper, we propose a solution for explaining the different treatments of the floating conclusion in the various examples from the literature. We collect the examples from the literature, extend them with additional examples and test various hypotheses for explaining the difference by means of the examples. We will argue for a framework that accepts a floating conclusion by default but allows for reasons to deviate from the default in order to reject it. These reasons nicely explain the different underlying patterns of our intuitions.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Floating Conclusions, Defeasible Reasoning, Skeptical Reasoning
Konferenz
Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, 16th International Conference, DEON 2023, 5. Juli 2023 - 7. Juli 2023, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
SCHUSTER, Daniela, Jan BROERSEN, Henry PRAKKEN, 2023. On Floating Conclusions. Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, 16th International Conference, DEON 2023. Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada, 5. Juli 2023 - 7. Juli 2023. In: MARANHÃO, Juliano, Hrsg., Clayton PETERSON, Hrsg., Christian STRASSER, Hrsg., Leendert VAN DER TORRE, Hrsg.. Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. Rickmansworth: College Publications, 2023, S. 199-215BibTex
@inproceedings{Schuster2023Float-67373,
year={2023},
title={On Floating Conclusions},
url={http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/downloads/DEON00004.pdf},
publisher={College Publications},
address={Rickmansworth},
booktitle={Deontic Logic and Normative Systems},
pages={199--215},
editor={Maranhão, Juliano and Peterson, Clayton and Straßer, Christian and van der Torre, Leendert},
author={Schuster, Daniela and Broersen, Jan and Prakken, Henry}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/67373">
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/67373"/>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dc:creator>Prakken, Henry</dc:creator>
<dcterms:title>On Floating Conclusions</dcterms:title>
<dc:contributor>Schuster, Daniela</dc:contributor>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-07-18T12:03:26Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Broersen, Jan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Schuster, Daniela</dc:creator>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/67373/4/Schuster_2-1bfr2gxjzwzrj9.pdf"/>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/67373/4/Schuster_2-1bfr2gxjzwzrj9.pdf"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-07-18T12:03:26Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:abstract>When there are two lines of argument that contradict each other but still end up with the same conclusion, this conclusion is called a floating conclusion. It is an open topic in skeptical defeasible reasoning if floating conclusions ought to be accepted. Interestingly, the answer seems to be changing for different examples. In this paper, we propose a solution for explaining the different treatments of the floating conclusion in the various examples from the literature. We collect the examples from the literature, extend them with additional examples and test various hypotheses for explaining the difference by means of the examples. We will argue for a framework that accepts a floating conclusion by default but allows for reasons to deviate from the default in order to reject it. These reasons nicely explain the different underlying patterns of our intuitions.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dc:contributor>Prakken, Henry</dc:contributor>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dc:contributor>Broersen, Jan</dc:contributor>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
2023-07-18
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
