Understanding local crisis management in complex organisational settings : The case of the migration crisis in Germany 2015/16

This paper offers a first conceptual step towards measuring what effect variation of administrative action in crisis management has on societal resilience during times of crisis. Building on previous work, we see the ability of administrations to moderate the (perceived) legitimacy of their actions in crisis management as the main mechanism for such an effect. Local administrations can enhance legitimacy a) if they create conditions for the participation of organized forms of civic engagement in crisis management, and b) if they manage the crisis effectively. The concept of “organizational hybridity” is introduced to propose four possible styles of administrative crisis management: Street-level bureaucracy; leadership-based administration; consultative administration; and classic-bureaucratic administration. The paper briefly discusses how this concept could be applied in the context of the German “migration crisis” of 2015/16.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Konferenz

Third Northern European Conference on Emergency and Disaster Studies, 21. März 2018 - 23. März 2018, Amsterdam

Zitieren

ISO 690

ROTH, Florian, Wolfgang SEIBEL, Lorenz WIESE, Matthias FATKE, Steffen ECKHARD, Alexa LENZ, 2018. Understanding local crisis management in complex organisational settings : The case of the migration crisis in Germany 2015/16. Third Northern European Conference on Emergency and Disaster Studies. Amsterdam, 21. März 2018 - 23. März 2018. In: Paper presented at the Third Northern European Conference on Emergency and Disaster Studies. 2018

BibTex

@inproceedings{Roth2018Under-52247,
  year={2018},
  title={Understanding local crisis management in complex organisational settings : The case of the migration crisis in Germany 2015/16},
  url={https://www.hyborg-projekt.de/dokumente/},
  booktitle={Paper presented at the Third Northern European Conference on Emergency and Disaster Studies},
  author={Roth, Florian and Seibel, Wolfgang and Wiese, Lorenz and Fatke, Matthias and Eckhard, Steffen and Lenz, Alexa}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52247">
    <dc:creator>Eckhard, Steffen</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Wiese, Lorenz</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-12-22T15:01:30Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Seibel, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-12-22T15:01:30Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Wiese, Lorenz</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper offers a first conceptual step towards measuring what effect variation of administrative action in crisis management has on societal resilience during times of crisis. Building on previous work, we see the ability of administrations to moderate the (perceived) legitimacy of their actions in crisis management as the main mechanism for such an effect. Local administrations can enhance legitimacy a) if they create conditions for the participation of organized forms of civic engagement in crisis management, and b) if they manage the crisis effectively. The concept of “organizational hybridity” is introduced to propose four possible styles of administrative crisis management: Street-level bureaucracy; leadership-based administration; consultative administration; and classic-bureaucratic administration. The paper briefly discusses how this concept could be applied in the context of the German “migration crisis” of 2015/16.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Fatke, Matthias</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Lenz, Alexa</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Roth, Florian</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Eckhard, Steffen</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52247"/>
    <dc:contributor>Roth, Florian</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Understanding local crisis management in complex organisational settings : The case of the migration crisis in Germany 2015/16</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:issued>2018</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Lenz, Alexa</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Seibel, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Fatke, Matthias</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

URL der Originalveröffentl.

https://www.hyborg-projekt.de/dokumente/

Prüfdatum der URL

2020-12-22

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja