Publikation: Lettres de Paris par le P.N.D.G. : Lettres sur l'Histoire de France? : La critique de l’histoire chez Stendhal et les historiens libéraux
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Considering a new generation of historians and a new way of writing history, Stendhal is himself part of the debates about a new 'writing culture' in an emerging historical science from 1820 on. Contributing regularly to the British press, Stendhal reviews not only a wide range of novels, but also many of these contemporary historiographical works. Both Stendhal and mostly liberal french historians share a self-perception of a young new generation that overcomes old debates. Thus, as this article shows, Stendhal adopts the role of a critic in the sense of the french Enlightenement and sticks to important parts of this Enlightenment-ethos for his self-positioning as an author, while the 'new historians' tend to exaggerate their emancipation from Enlightenment positions for the sake of their much asserted novelty.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
LAMMERS, Philipp, 2018. Lettres de Paris par le P.N.D.G. : Lettres sur l'Histoire de France? : La critique de l’histoire chez Stendhal et les historiens libéraux. In: L’Année Stendhalienne. Champion. 2018, 16, pp. 135-150BibTex
@article{Lammers2018Lettr-54220, year={2018}, title={Lettres de Paris par le P.N.D.G. : Lettres sur l'Histoire de France? : La critique de l’histoire chez Stendhal et les historiens libéraux}, url={https://hal.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/hal-01955567}, volume={16}, journal={L’Année Stendhalienne}, pages={135--150}, author={Lammers, Philipp} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54220"> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/> <dcterms:issued>2018</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54220"/> <dc:contributor>Lammers, Philipp</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Lammers, Philipp</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:title>Lettres de Paris par le P.N.D.G. : Lettres sur l'Histoire de France? : La critique de l’histoire chez Stendhal et les historiens libéraux</dcterms:title> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-07-06T13:38:58Z</dcterms:available> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:language>fra</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-07-06T13:38:58Z</dc:date> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="fra">Considering a new generation of historians and a new way of writing history, Stendhal is himself part of the debates about a new 'writing culture' in an emerging historical science from 1820 on. Contributing regularly to the British press, Stendhal reviews not only a wide range of novels, but also many of these contemporary historiographical works. Both Stendhal and mostly liberal french historians share a self-perception of a young new generation that overcomes old debates. Thus, as this article shows, Stendhal adopts the role of a critic in the sense of the french Enlightenement and sticks to important parts of this Enlightenment-ethos for his self-positioning as an author, while the 'new historians' tend to exaggerate their emancipation from Enlightenment positions for the sake of their much asserted novelty.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>