Liminality : A Governing Category in Animate History

Wischermann, Clemens; Howell, Philip

Liminality : A Governing Category in Animate History

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2019

Autor:innen

Wischermann, Clemens

Howell, Philip

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)

https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350054066.0006

Sammlungen

Geschichte

Publikationstyp

Beitrag zu einem Sammelband

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

WISCHERMANN, Clemens, ed., Aline STEINBRECHER, ed., Philip HOWELL, ed.. Animal history in the modern city : exploring liminality. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019, pp. 1-24. ISBN 978-1-350-05403-5. Available under: doi: 10.5040/9781350054066.0006

Zusammenfassung

A generation ago animal history was in its infancy, if hard to place historiographically. Was it an extension of growing environmental awareness in the humanities, with non-human animals as useful proxies for the fate of ‘Nature’ as a whole? Were animals merely the last and least heralded of the marginalized and oppressed groups whose interests are championed by social historians? Should we understand animals as historical agents in their own right, or simply concentrate on how human beings in different times and places have represented them? Historians and scholars from other disciplines continue to offer different answers, but some of the ideas that once seemed outlandish now appear uncontroversial, and the debates themselves have contributed to what is a lively and rapidly developing field.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

900 Geschichte

Zitieren

ISO 690

WISCHERMANN, Clemens, Philip HOWELL, 2019. Liminality : A Governing Category in Animate History. In: WISCHERMANN, Clemens, ed., Aline STEINBRECHER, ed., Philip HOWELL, ed.. Animal history in the modern city : exploring liminality. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019, pp. 1-24. ISBN 978-1-350-05403-5. Available under: doi: 10.5040/9781350054066.0006

BibTex

@incollection{Wischermann2019Limin-51658,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.5040/9781350054066.0006},
  title={Liminality : A Governing Category in Animate History},
  isbn={978-1-350-05403-5},
  publisher={Bloomsbury Academic},
  address={London},
  booktitle={Animal history in the modern city : exploring liminality},
  pages={1--24},
  editor={Wischermann, Clemens and Steinbrecher, Aline and Howell, Philip},
  author={Wischermann, Clemens and Howell, Philip}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/51658">
    <dc:creator>Howell, Philip</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/51658"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Wischermann, Clemens</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-11-05T08:37:35Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:title>Liminality : A Governing Category in Animate History</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-11-05T08:37:35Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Howell, Philip</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Wischermann, Clemens</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">A generation ago animal history was in its infancy, if hard to place historiographically. Was it an extension of growing environmental awareness in the humanities, with non-human animals as useful proxies for the fate of ‘Nature’ as a whole? Were animals merely the last and least heralded of the marginalized and oppressed groups whose interests are championed by social historians? Should we understand animals as historical agents in their own right, or simply concentrate on how human beings in different times and places have represented them? Historians and scholars from other disciplines continue to offer different answers, but some of the ideas that once seemed outlandish now appear uncontroversial, and the debates themselves have contributed to what is a lively and rapidly developing field.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja