Publikation: Liminality : A Governing Category in Animate History
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
A generation ago animal history was in its infancy, if hard to place historiographically. Was it an extension of growing environmental awareness in the humanities, with non-human animals as useful proxies for the fate of ‘Nature’ as a whole? Were animals merely the last and least heralded of the marginalized and oppressed groups whose interests are championed by social historians? Should we understand animals as historical agents in their own right, or simply concentrate on how human beings in different times and places have represented them? Historians and scholars from other disciplines continue to offer different answers, but some of the ideas that once seemed outlandish now appear uncontroversial, and the debates themselves have contributed to what is a lively and rapidly developing field.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
WISCHERMANN, Clemens, Philip HOWELL, 2019. Liminality : A Governing Category in Animate History. In: WISCHERMANN, Clemens, ed., Aline STEINBRECHER, ed., Philip HOWELL, ed.. Animal history in the modern city : exploring liminality. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019, pp. 1-24. ISBN 978-1-350-05403-5. Available under: doi: 10.5040/9781350054066.0006BibTex
@incollection{Wischermann2019Limin-51658, year={2019}, doi={10.5040/9781350054066.0006}, title={Liminality : A Governing Category in Animate History}, isbn={978-1-350-05403-5}, publisher={Bloomsbury Academic}, address={London}, booktitle={Animal history in the modern city : exploring liminality}, pages={1--24}, editor={Wischermann, Clemens and Steinbrecher, Aline and Howell, Philip}, author={Wischermann, Clemens and Howell, Philip} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/51658"> <dc:creator>Howell, Philip</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/51658"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Wischermann, Clemens</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-11-05T08:37:35Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:title>Liminality : A Governing Category in Animate History</dcterms:title> <dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-11-05T08:37:35Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Howell, Philip</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Wischermann, Clemens</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">A generation ago animal history was in its infancy, if hard to place historiographically. Was it an extension of growing environmental awareness in the humanities, with non-human animals as useful proxies for the fate of ‘Nature’ as a whole? Were animals merely the last and least heralded of the marginalized and oppressed groups whose interests are championed by social historians? Should we understand animals as historical agents in their own right, or simply concentrate on how human beings in different times and places have represented them? Historians and scholars from other disciplines continue to offer different answers, but some of the ideas that once seemed outlandish now appear uncontroversial, and the debates themselves have contributed to what is a lively and rapidly developing field.</dcterms:abstract> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>