The Two Faces of Judicial Power : Dynamics of Judicial-Political Bargaining

Engst, Benjamin G.

The Two Faces of Judicial Power : Dynamics of Judicial-Political Bargaining

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2021

Autor:innen

Engst, Benjamin G.

ISBN

978-3-030-46015-0

Verlag

Cham: Palgrave Macmillan

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7

Sammlungen

Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft

Publikationstyp

Monographie

Publikationsstatus

Published

Zusammenfassung

This book shows that constitutional courts exercise direct and indirect power on political branches through decision-making. The first face of judicial power is characterized by courts directing political actors to implement judicial decisions in specific ways. The second face leads political actors to anticipate judicial review and draft policies accordingly. The judicial–political interaction originating from both faces is herein formally modeled. A cross-European comparison of pre-conditions of judicial power shows that the German Federal Constitutional Court is a well-suited representative case for a quantitative assessment of judicial power. Multinomial logistic regressions show that the court uses directives when evasion of decisions is costly while accounting for the government’s ability to implement decisions. Causal analyses of the second face of judicial power show that bills exposed to legal signals are drafted accounting for the court. These findings re-shape our understanding of judicialization and shed light on a silent form of judicialization.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Zitieren

ISO 690

ENGST, Benjamin G., 2021. The Two Faces of Judicial Power : Dynamics of Judicial-Political Bargaining. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-3-030-46015-0

BibTex

@book{Engst2021Faces-55287,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7},
  isbn={978-3-030-46015-0},
  publisher={Palgrave Macmillan},
  address={Cham},
  title={The Two Faces of Judicial Power : Dynamics of Judicial-Political Bargaining},
  author={Engst, Benjamin G.}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55287">
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Engst, Benjamin G.</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:publisher>Palgrave Macmillan</dc:publisher>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55287"/>
    <dc:publisher>Cham</dc:publisher>
    <dc:contributor>Engst, Benjamin G.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <bibo:issn>978-3-030-46015-0</bibo:issn>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-19T11:27:48Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-19T11:27:48Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This book shows that constitutional courts exercise direct and indirect power on political branches through decision-making. The first face of judicial power is characterized by courts directing political actors to implement judicial decisions in specific ways. The second face leads political actors to anticipate judicial review and draft policies accordingly. The judicial–political interaction originating from both faces is herein formally modeled. A cross-European comparison of pre-conditions of judicial power shows that the German Federal Constitutional Court is a well-suited representative case for a quantitative assessment of judicial power. Multinomial logistic regressions show that the court uses directives when evasion of decisions is costly while accounting for the government’s ability to implement decisions. Causal analyses of the second face of judicial power show that bills exposed to legal signals are drafted accounting for the court. These findings re-shape our understanding of judicialization and shed light on a silent form of judicialization.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:title>The Two Faces of Judicial Power : Dynamics of Judicial-Political Bargaining</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja