The echo in flu-vaccination echo chambers : Selective attention trumps social influence
The echo in flu-vaccination echo chambers : Selective attention trumps social influence
Loading...
Date
2020
Authors
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
URI (citable link)
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Published in
Vaccine ; 38 (2020), 8. - pp. 2070-2076. - Elsevier. - ISSN 0264-410X. - eISSN 1873-2518
Abstract
Background
Online discussions may impact the willingness to get vaccinated. This experiment tests how groups of individuals with consistent and inconsistent attitudes towards flu vaccination attend to and convey information online, and how they alter their corresponding risk perceptions.
Methods
Out of 1859 MTurkers, we pre-selected 208 people with negative and 221 people with positive attitudes towards flu vaccinations into homogeneous or heterogeneous 3-link experimental diffusion chains. We assessed (i) which information about flu vaccinations participants conveyed to the subsequent link, (ii) how flu-vaccination related perceptions were altered by incoming messages, and (iii) how participants perceived incoming information.
Results
Participants (i) selectively conveyed attitude-consistent information, but exhibited no overall anti-vaccination bias, (ii) were reluctant to alter their flu-vaccination related perceptions in response to messages, and (iii) evaluated incoming information consistent with their prior attitudes as more convincing.
Discussion
Flu-vaccination related perceptions are resilient against contradictions and bias online communication. Contrary to expectations, there was no sign of amplification of anti-vaccine attitudes by online communication.
Online discussions may impact the willingness to get vaccinated. This experiment tests how groups of individuals with consistent and inconsistent attitudes towards flu vaccination attend to and convey information online, and how they alter their corresponding risk perceptions.
Methods
Out of 1859 MTurkers, we pre-selected 208 people with negative and 221 people with positive attitudes towards flu vaccinations into homogeneous or heterogeneous 3-link experimental diffusion chains. We assessed (i) which information about flu vaccinations participants conveyed to the subsequent link, (ii) how flu-vaccination related perceptions were altered by incoming messages, and (iii) how participants perceived incoming information.
Results
Participants (i) selectively conveyed attitude-consistent information, but exhibited no overall anti-vaccination bias, (ii) were reluctant to alter their flu-vaccination related perceptions in response to messages, and (iii) evaluated incoming information consistent with their prior attitudes as more convincing.
Discussion
Flu-vaccination related perceptions are resilient against contradictions and bias online communication. Contrary to expectations, there was no sign of amplification of anti-vaccine attitudes by online communication.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
150 Psychology
Keywords
Amplification of risk, Diffusion chain, Opinion dynamics, accine hesitancy, Social media, Polarization
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
GIESE, Helge, Hansjörg NETH, Mehdi MOUSSAÏD, Cornelia BETSCH, Wolfgang GAISSMAIER, 2020. The echo in flu-vaccination echo chambers : Selective attention trumps social influence. In: Vaccine. Elsevier. 38(8), pp. 2070-2076. ISSN 0264-410X. eISSN 1873-2518. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.038BibTex
@article{Giese2020-02fluva-48136, year={2020}, doi={10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.038}, title={The echo in flu-vaccination echo chambers : Selective attention trumps social influence}, number={8}, volume={38}, issn={0264-410X}, journal={Vaccine}, pages={2070--2076}, author={Giese, Helge and Neth, Hansjörg and Moussaïd, Mehdi and Betsch, Cornelia and Gaissmaier, Wolfgang} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/48136"> <dc:contributor>Gaissmaier, Wolfgang</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/48136"/> <dc:creator>Moussaïd, Mehdi</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/48136/1/Giese_2-1dg2xokp71hzp9.PDF"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Background<br />Online discussions may impact the willingness to get vaccinated. This experiment tests how groups of individuals with consistent and inconsistent attitudes towards flu vaccination attend to and convey information online, and how they alter their corresponding risk perceptions.<br /><br />Methods<br />Out of 1859 MTurkers, we pre-selected 208 people with negative and 221 people with positive attitudes towards flu vaccinations into homogeneous or heterogeneous 3-link experimental diffusion chains. We assessed (i) which information about flu vaccinations participants conveyed to the subsequent link, (ii) how flu-vaccination related perceptions were altered by incoming messages, and (iii) how participants perceived incoming information.<br /><br />Results<br />Participants (i) selectively conveyed attitude-consistent information, but exhibited no overall anti-vaccination bias, (ii) were reluctant to alter their flu-vaccination related perceptions in response to messages, and (iii) evaluated incoming information consistent with their prior attitudes as more convincing.<br /><br />Discussion<br />Flu-vaccination related perceptions are resilient against contradictions and bias online communication. Contrary to expectations, there was no sign of amplification of anti-vaccine attitudes by online communication.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Moussaïd, Mehdi</dc:contributor> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/48136/1/Giese_2-1dg2xokp71hzp9.PDF"/> <dc:creator>Betsch, Cornelia</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:contributor>Betsch, Cornelia</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Gaissmaier, Wolfgang</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-01-02T13:13:23Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Giese, Helge</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>The echo in flu-vaccination echo chambers : Selective attention trumps social influence</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-01-02T13:13:23Z</dc:date> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:creator>Neth, Hansjörg</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Neth, Hansjörg</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2020-02</dcterms:issued> <dc:creator>Giese, Helge</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes
Refereed
Yes