Animism and science in European perspective

dc.contributor.authorKochan, Jeff
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-26T06:43:44Z
dc.date.available2024-01-26T06:43:44Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThe European tradition makes a sharp distinction between animism and science. On the basis of this distinction, either animism is reproved for failing to reach the heights of science, or science is reproved for failing to reach the heights of animism. In this essay, I draw on work in the history and philosophy and science, combined with a method from the sociology of scientific knowledge, to question the sharpness of this distinction. Along the way, I also take guidance from the research of North American Indigenous scholars. As it turns out, there is a rich, if largely overlooked, tradition of Aristotelian animism running through the history of modern European science, and this tradition sometimes resonates with Indigenous perspectives. By challenging the entrenched distinction between animism and science, I aim to help reconcile ongoing tensions between Indigenous and European scientific groups, and so strengthen prospects for their mutually beneficial cooperation.
dc.description.versionpublisheddeu
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.11.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/69174
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subject.ddc100
dc.titleAnimism and science in European perspectiveeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLE
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Kochan2024Animi-69174,
  year={2024},
  doi={10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.11.001},
  title={Animism and science in European perspective},
  volume={103},
  issn={0039-3681},
  journal={Studies in History and Philosophy of Science},
  pages={46--57},
  author={Kochan, Jeff}
}
kops.citation.iso690KOCHAN, Jeff, 2024. Animism and science in European perspective. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Elsevier. 2024, 103, pp. 46-57. ISSN 0039-3681. eISSN 1879-2510. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.11.001deu
kops.citation.iso690KOCHAN, Jeff, 2024. Animism and science in European perspective. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Elsevier. 2024, 103, pp. 46-57. ISSN 0039-3681. eISSN 1879-2510. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.11.001eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/69174">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-01-26T06:43:44Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/69174"/>
    <dcterms:title>Animism and science in European perspective</dcterms:title>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:abstract>The European tradition makes a sharp distinction between animism and science. On the basis of this distinction, either animism is reproved for failing to reach the heights of science, or science is reproved for failing to reach the heights of animism. In this essay, I draw on work in the history and philosophy and science, combined with a method from the sociology of scientific knowledge, to question the sharpness of this distinction. Along the way, I also take guidance from the research of North American Indigenous scholars. As it turns out, there is a rich, if largely overlooked, tradition of Aristotelian animism running through the history of modern European science, and this tradition sometimes resonates with Indigenous perspectives. By challenging the entrenched distinction between animism and science, I aim to help reconcile ongoing tensions between Indigenous and European scientific groups, and so strengthen prospects for their mutually beneficial cooperation.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Kochan, Jeff</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-01-26T06:43:44Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Kochan, Jeff</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2024</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrue
kops.flag.knbibliographyfalse
kops.sourcefieldStudies in History and Philosophy of Science. Elsevier. 2024, <b>103</b>, pp. 46-57. ISSN 0039-3681. eISSN 1879-2510. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.11.001deu
kops.sourcefield.plainStudies in History and Philosophy of Science. Elsevier. 2024, 103, pp. 46-57. ISSN 0039-3681. eISSN 1879-2510. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.11.001deu
kops.sourcefield.plainStudies in History and Philosophy of Science. Elsevier. 2024, 103, pp. 46-57. ISSN 0039-3681. eISSN 1879-2510. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.11.001eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa1218cf1-fb4d-43ec-a9c6-23eddb3987e1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya1218cf1-fb4d-43ec-a9c6-23eddb3987e1
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage46
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage57
source.bibliographicInfo.volume103
source.identifier.eissn1879-2510
source.identifier.issn0039-3681
source.periodicalTitleStudies in History and Philosophy of Science
source.publisherElsevier

Dateien