Publikation:

Rise of canonical objecthood with the Lithuanian verbs of pain

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2013

Autor:innen

Seržant, Ilja A.

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Baltic Linguistics. 2013, 4, pp. 187-211. ISSN 2081-7533

Zusammenfassung

The present paper aims to uncover the processes governing the rise of canonical case-markings. Experiencer verbs with the ᴅᴀᴛExp–ɴᴏᴍStim case frame must necessarily first acquire canonical case marking on their second argument in order to enable the acquisition of the nominative by their first argument. The present paper concentrates, thus, on the acquisition of the accusative case by the second argument. Lithuanian verbs of pain are taken under scrutiny. I examine the change that leads to the acquisition of canonical objecthood, namely, the change from the original ᴅᴀᴛExp–ɴᴏᴍBodyPart case frame to the more canonical ᴅᴀᴛExp–ᴀᴄᴄBodyPart case frame. In the latter, the body-part argument not only acquires the canonical object marking, but also certain syntactic object properties as, for example, the obligatory change into genitive under negation. Strikingly, this change is only found with the verbs of pain skaudėti ‘to ache’ and dial. sopėti ‘to ache’ in Lithuanian, while other ᴅᴀᴛExp–ɴᴏᴍStim experiencer verbs do not undergo this change. I argue that the rise of the canonical object with ᴅᴀᴛExp–ɴᴏᴍBodyPart verbs of pain in Lithuanian is due to some analogical processes internal to the semantic class of verbs of pain and not to a general drift leading to the acquisition of canonical case assignments. Verbs of pain represent a more complex subclass of experiencer verbs in that they typically take three arguments, namely, experiencer, body-part and stimulus. Those verbs that encode all three participants of the pain event as core arguments typically have the following case frame in Baltic: ɴᴏᴍStim– ᴅᴀᴛExp–ᴀᴄᴄBodyPart. I argue that the loss of the stimulus position by some of these triadic causal verbs of pain let them conflate semantically with the dyadic stative ᴅᴀᴛExp–ɴᴏᴍBodyPart verbs of pain. This semantic merger results in the redundancy of the morphosyntactic variation between ᴅᴀᴛExp–ɴᴏᴍBodyPart and ᴅᴀᴛExp-ᴀᴄᴄBodyPart which, in turn, leads to a generalization of one particular case frame: ᴅᴀᴛExp–ᴀᴄᴄBodyPart in the standard language and ᴅᴀᴛExp–ɴᴏᴍBodyPart in some dialects.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik

Schlagwörter

Lithuanian, verbs of pain, case frame, canonicization, objecthood, productivity, dative-accusative pattern, dative-nominative pattern, alignment

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690SERŽANT, Ilja A., 2013. Rise of canonical objecthood with the Lithuanian verbs of pain. In: Baltic Linguistics. 2013, 4, pp. 187-211. ISSN 2081-7533
BibTex
@article{Serzant2013canon-45168,
  year={2013},
  title={Rise of canonical objecthood with the Lithuanian verbs of pain},
  url={http://www.balticlinguistics.uw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/full_texts/BL4_serzant.pdf},
  volume={4},
  issn={2081-7533},
  journal={Baltic Linguistics},
  pages={187--211},
  author={Seržant, Ilja A.}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45168">
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The present paper aims to uncover the processes governing the rise of canonical case-markings. Experiencer verbs with the ᴅᴀᴛ&lt;sub&gt;Exp&lt;/sub&gt;–ɴᴏᴍ&lt;sub&gt;Stim&lt;/sub&gt; case frame must necessarily first acquire canonical case marking on their second argument in order to enable the acquisition of the nominative by their first argument. The present paper concentrates, thus, on the acquisition of the accusative case by the second argument. Lithuanian verbs of pain are taken under scrutiny. I examine the change that leads to the acquisition of canonical objecthood, namely, the change from the original ᴅᴀᴛ&lt;sub&gt;Exp&lt;/sub&gt;–ɴᴏᴍ&lt;sub&gt;BodyPart&lt;/sub&gt; case frame to the more canonical ᴅᴀᴛ&lt;sub&gt;Exp&lt;/sub&gt;–ᴀᴄᴄ&lt;sub&gt;BodyPart&lt;/sub&gt; case frame. In the latter, the body-part argument not only acquires the canonical object marking, but also certain syntactic object properties as, for example, the obligatory change into genitive under negation. Strikingly, this change is only found with the verbs of pain skaudėti ‘to ache’ and dial. sopėti ‘to ache’ in Lithuanian, while other ᴅᴀᴛ&lt;sub&gt;Exp&lt;/sub&gt;–ɴᴏᴍ&lt;sub&gt;Stim&lt;/sub&gt; experiencer verbs do not undergo this change. I argue that the rise of the canonical object with ᴅᴀᴛ&lt;sub&gt;Exp&lt;/sub&gt;–ɴᴏᴍ&lt;sub&gt;BodyPart&lt;/sub&gt; verbs of pain in Lithuanian is due to some analogical processes internal to the semantic class of verbs of pain and not to a general drift leading to the acquisition of canonical case assignments. Verbs of pain represent a more complex subclass of experiencer verbs in that they typically take three arguments, namely, experiencer, body-part and stimulus. Those verbs that encode all three participants of the pain event as core arguments typically have the following case frame in Baltic: ɴᴏᴍStim– ᴅᴀᴛ&lt;sub&gt;Exp&lt;/sub&gt;–ᴀᴄᴄ&lt;sub&gt;BodyPart&lt;/sub&gt;. I argue that the loss of the stimulus position by some of these triadic causal verbs of pain let them conflate semantically with the dyadic stative ᴅᴀᴛ&lt;sub&gt;Exp&lt;/sub&gt;–ɴᴏᴍ&lt;sub&gt;BodyPart&lt;/sub&gt; verbs of pain. This semantic merger results in the redundancy of the morphosyntactic variation between ᴅᴀᴛ&lt;sub&gt;Exp&lt;/sub&gt;–ɴᴏᴍ&lt;sub&gt;BodyPart&lt;/sub&gt; and ᴅᴀᴛ&lt;sub&gt;Exp&lt;/sub&gt;-ᴀᴄᴄ&lt;sub&gt;BodyPart&lt;/sub&gt; which, in turn, leads to a generalization of one particular case frame: ᴅᴀᴛ&lt;sub&gt;Exp&lt;/sub&gt;–ᴀᴄᴄ&lt;sub&gt;BodyPart&lt;/sub&gt; in the standard language and ᴅᴀᴛ&lt;sub&gt;Exp&lt;/sub&gt;–ɴᴏᴍ&lt;sub&gt;BodyPart&lt;/sub&gt; in some dialects.</dcterms:abstract>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/45168"/>
    <dc:contributor>Seržant, Ilja A.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-02-23T10:57:16Z</dcterms:available>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-02-23T10:57:16Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:title>Rise of canonical objecthood with the Lithuanian verbs of pain</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Seržant, Ilja A.</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Begutachtet
Unbekannt
Diese Publikation teilen