Publikation: Der Status von Peter Stemmers Metaethik
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2018
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie. 2018, 66(5), pp. 686-702. ISSN 0012-1045. eISSN 2192-1482. Available under: doi: 10.1515/dzph-2018-0048
Zusammenfassung
Peter Stemmer provides a moral theory that construes moral normativity and correlated phenomenona as essentially constituted by sanctions. Neither Stemmer nor his critics reflect sufficiently on the metaethical status of these claims, even though it is important to be clear about this status to evaluate the approach. I argue that there are two different readings of the theory: Either the “Sanktionstheorie” is a kind of descriptive metaethical theory or it is what I call a constructive (or revisionary) theory. Stemmer’s approach is better understood as a constructive metaethical theory, whereas critics mainly focus on a descriptive reading.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
normativity; moral theory; sanctions; metaethics; Peter Stemmer
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
WENDELBORN, Christian, 2018. Der Status von Peter Stemmers Metaethik. In: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie. 2018, 66(5), pp. 686-702. ISSN 0012-1045. eISSN 2192-1482. Available under: doi: 10.1515/dzph-2018-0048BibTex
@article{Wendelborn2018-10-25Statu-45438,
year={2018},
doi={10.1515/dzph-2018-0048},
title={Der Status von Peter Stemmers Metaethik},
number={5},
volume={66},
issn={0012-1045},
journal={Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie},
pages={686--702},
author={Wendelborn, Christian}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45438">
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dc:language>deu</dc:language>
<dcterms:title>Der Status von Peter Stemmers Metaethik</dcterms:title>
<dc:contributor>Wendelborn, Christian</dc:contributor>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:creator>Wendelborn, Christian</dc:creator>
<dcterms:issued>2018-10-25</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">Peter Stemmer provides a moral theory that construes moral normativity and correlated phenomenona as essentially constituted by sanctions. Neither Stemmer nor his critics reflect sufficiently on the metaethical status of these claims, even though it is important to be clear about this status to evaluate the approach. I argue that there are two different readings of the theory: Either the “Sanktionstheorie” is a kind of descriptive metaethical theory or it is what I call a constructive (or revisionary) theory. Stemmer’s approach is better understood as a constructive metaethical theory, whereas critics mainly focus on a descriptive reading.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-03-12T17:49:20Z</dc:date>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/45438/1/Wendelborn_2-1gxcai1csgohl8.pdf"/>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/45438/1/Wendelborn_2-1gxcai1csgohl8.pdf"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-03-12T17:49:20Z</dcterms:available>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/45438"/>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Begutachtet
Ja
