Publikation: Projection in interaction and projection in grammar
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
One of the central theoretical concerns of present-day linguistics is the question of whether grammatical knowledge represents an autonomous component of the human mind and is therefore independent of interactional (or any other nongrammatical) competence. I will argue in this paper that there are fundamental common features shared by interaction and grammar which suggest some kind of interdependence between the two. One of them is projectability. Human interaction rests on the possibility of projection; the grammars of human languages provide interlocutors with sedimentated and shared ways of organising projection in interaction. I will propose a homologous mechanism of projection in interaction and in grammar. The argument is based on examples from German (a mixed verb-second and verbfinal language) but can be easily transferred to other languages of a similar syntactic type (particularly verb-second languages have been shown to behave similarly). The application to consistent verb-final languages is outside the scope of this paper (but see Auer 1990 for Turkish and Couper-Kuhlen/Ono MS 2003 for Japanese).
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
AUER, Peter, 2002. Projection in interaction and projection in grammarBibTex
@techreport{Auer2002Proje-3742, year={2002}, series={InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures}, title={Projection in interaction and projection in grammar}, number={33}, author={Auer, Peter} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/3742"> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:06:21Z</dc:date> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3742/1/Inlist33.pdf"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:issued>2002</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:06:21Z</dcterms:available> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dc:contributor>Auer, Peter</dc:contributor> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3742/1/Inlist33.pdf"/> <dc:creator>Auer, Peter</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:title>Projection in interaction and projection in grammar</dcterms:title> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">One of the central theoretical concerns of present-day linguistics is the question of whether grammatical knowledge represents an autonomous component of the human mind and is therefore independent of interactional (or any other nongrammatical) competence. I will argue in this paper that there are fundamental common features shared by interaction and grammar which suggest some kind of interdependence between the two. One of them is projectability. Human interaction rests on the possibility of projection; the grammars of human languages provide interlocutors with sedimentated and shared ways of organising projection in interaction. I will propose a homologous mechanism of projection in interaction and in grammar. The argument is based on examples from German (a mixed verb-second and verbfinal language) but can be easily transferred to other languages of a similar syntactic type (particularly verb-second languages have been shown to behave similarly). The application to consistent verb-final languages is outside the scope of this paper (but see Auer 1990 for Turkish and Couper-Kuhlen/Ono MS 2003 for Japanese).</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3742"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>