Publikation:

Parenthesis : Syntactic Integration or Orphanage? A Rejoinder to Ott (2016)

Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2019

Autor:innen

de Vries, Mark

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00314
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Sammlungen

Zukunftskolleg: Publikationen
Linguistik: Publikationen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Linguistic Inquiry. 2019, 50(3), pp. 609-629. ISSN 0024-3892. eISSN 1530-9150. Available under: doi: 10.1162/ling_a_00314

Zusammenfassung

Griffiths & De Vries (G&dV, 2013) offer an argument in favor of treating appositive relative clauses (ARCs) as syntactically integrated into their hosts which revolves around the distribution of ARCs in clausal ellipsis environments. In a recent reply to G&dV, Ott (2016) counters this specific argument, discards the more general integration analysis adopted by G&dV on conceptual grounds, and contends that an orphanage analysis of ARCs provides a more parsimonious explanation for the data that G&dV introduce. In this rejoinder, we demonstrate that, while Ott presents some relevant data and provides welcome discussion, his specific counterargument does not withstand scrutiny. We also defend the integration approach to ARCs on conceptual and empirical grounds and examine the orphanage analysis of ARCs, arguing that such an approach has conceptual and empirical inadequacies that no integration approach exhibits.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik

Schlagwörter

appositive relative clauses, ellipsis, extraposition, integration, orphanage

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690GRIFFITHS, James, Mark DE VRIES, 2019. Parenthesis : Syntactic Integration or Orphanage? A Rejoinder to Ott (2016). In: Linguistic Inquiry. 2019, 50(3), pp. 609-629. ISSN 0024-3892. eISSN 1530-9150. Available under: doi: 10.1162/ling_a_00314
BibTex
@article{Griffiths2019-06Paren-44928,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.1162/ling_a_00314},
  title={Parenthesis : Syntactic Integration or Orphanage? A Rejoinder to Ott (2016)},
  number={3},
  volume={50},
  issn={0024-3892},
  journal={Linguistic Inquiry},
  pages={609--629},
  author={Griffiths, James and de Vries, Mark}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44928">
    <dc:creator>de Vries, Mark</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2019-06</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
    <dcterms:title>Parenthesis : Syntactic Integration or Orphanage? A Rejoinder to Ott (2016)</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
    <dc:contributor>Griffiths, James</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Griffiths &amp; De Vries (G&amp;dV, 2013) offer an argument in favor of treating appositive relative clauses (ARCs) as syntactically integrated into their hosts which revolves around the distribution of ARCs in clausal ellipsis environments. In a recent reply to G&amp;dV, Ott (2016) counters this specific argument, discards the more general integration analysis adopted by G&amp;dV on conceptual grounds, and contends that an orphanage analysis of ARCs provides a more parsimonious explanation for the data that G&amp;dV introduce. In this rejoinder, we demonstrate that, while Ott presents some relevant data and provides welcome discussion, his specific counterargument does not withstand scrutiny. We also defend the integration approach to ARCs on conceptual and empirical grounds and examine the orphanage analysis of ARCs, arguing that such an approach has conceptual and empirical inadequacies that no integration approach exhibits.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-02-07T17:01:12Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Griffiths, James</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>de Vries, Mark</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/44928"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-02-07T17:01:12Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen