Publikation:

Subjective assertions are weak : Exploring the illocutionary profile of perspective-dependent predicates

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Beltrama_2-1kkjtdg44r84q6.pdf
Beltrama_2-1kkjtdg44r84q6.pdfGröße: 384.26 KBDownloads: 59

Datum

2018

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Bookpart
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Konferenzband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

SAUERLAND, Uli, ed., Stephanie SOLT, ed.. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22. Konstanz: University of Konstanz, 2018, pp. 160-173. eISSN 2629-6055. Available under: doi: 10.18148/sub/2018.v22i1.84

Zusammenfassung

Sentences containing subjective predicates – e.g., “The movie was awesome” – are intuitively anchored to a particular perspective; this makes them different from sentences describing objective facts – e.g., “The movie was set in 1995”. While authors have long debated on whether this intuition tracks a lexical distinction between subjective and factual predicates, much remains to be explored on whether, and how, the difference between these two assertions is reflected at the illocutionary level. Relying on evidence from two experiments, we show that assertions containing subjective predicates display different discourse behavior from objective assertions. We take these findings to support the idea that SAs should be assigned a special illocutionary profile, unveiling a genuine empirical difference between subjective and factual speech.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik

Schlagwörter

subjectivity, discourse, assertion, Common Ground

Konferenz

Sinn und Bedeutung 22, 7. Sept. 2017 - 10. Sept. 2017, Berlin
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BELTRAMA, Andrea, 2018. Subjective assertions are weak : Exploring the illocutionary profile of perspective-dependent predicates. Sinn und Bedeutung 22. Berlin, 7. Sept. 2017 - 10. Sept. 2017. In: SAUERLAND, Uli, ed., Stephanie SOLT, ed.. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22. Konstanz: University of Konstanz, 2018, pp. 160-173. eISSN 2629-6055. Available under: doi: 10.18148/sub/2018.v22i1.84
BibTex
@inproceedings{Beltrama2018Subje-59101,
  year={2018},
  doi={10.18148/sub/2018.v22i1.84},
  title={Subjective assertions are weak : Exploring the illocutionary profile of perspective-dependent predicates},
  publisher={University of Konstanz},
  address={Konstanz},
  booktitle={Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22},
  pages={160--173},
  editor={Sauerland, Uli and Solt, Stephanie},
  author={Beltrama, Andrea}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/59101">
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/59101/1/Beltrama_2-1kkjtdg44r84q6.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/59101"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-11-10T10:11:13Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:issued>2018</dcterms:issued>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Sentences containing subjective predicates – e.g., “The movie was awesome” – are intuitively anchored to a particular perspective; this makes them different from sentences describing objective facts – e.g., “The movie was set in 1995”. While authors have long debated on whether this intuition tracks a lexical distinction between subjective and factual predicates, much remains to be explored on whether, and how, the difference between these two assertions is reflected at the illocutionary level. Relying on evidence from two experiments, we show that assertions containing subjective predicates display different discourse behavior from objective assertions. We take these findings to support the idea that SAs should be assigned a special illocutionary profile, unveiling a genuine empirical difference between subjective and factual speech.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-11-10T10:11:13Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/59101/1/Beltrama_2-1kkjtdg44r84q6.pdf"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Beltrama, Andrea</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:title>Subjective assertions are weak : Exploring the illocutionary profile of perspective-dependent predicates</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:contributor>Beltrama, Andrea</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen