Publikation:

How important is it to consider lineage diversification heterogeneity in macroevolutionary studies? : Lessons from the lizard family Liolaemidae

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Olave_2-1l6lrruughyy36.pdf
Olave_2-1l6lrruughyy36.pdfGröße: 1.77 MBDownloads: 203

Datum

2020

Autor:innen

Avila, Luciano J.
Sites, Jack W.
Morando, Mariana

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Journal of Biogeography. Wiley. 2020, 47(6), pp. 1286-1297. ISSN 0305-0270. eISSN 1365-2699. Available under: doi: 10.1111/jbi.13807

Zusammenfassung

Macroevolutionary and biogeographical studies commonly apply multiple models to test state‐dependent diversification. These models track the association between states of interest along a phylogeny, although many of them do not consider whether different clades might be evolving under different evolutionary drivers. Yet, they are still commonly applied to empirical studies without careful consideration of possible lineage diversification heterogeneity along the phylogenetic tree. A recent biogeographic study has suggested that orogenic uplift of the southern Andes has acted as a species pump, driving diversification of the lizard family Liolaemidae (307 described species), native to temperate southern South America. Here, we argue against the Andean uplift as main driver of evolution in this group. We show that there is a clear pattern of heterogeneous diversification in the Liolaemidae, which biases state‐ and environment‐dependent analyses in, respectively, the GeoSSE and RPANDA programs. We show here that there are two shifts to accelerated speciation rates involving two clades that have both been classified as having “Andean” distributions. We incorporated the Geographic Hidden‐State Speciation and Extinction model (GeoHiSSE) to accommodate unrelated diversification shifts, and also re‐analyzed the data in RPANDA program after splitting biologically distinct clades for separate analyses, as well as including a more appropriate set of models. We demonstrate that the “Andean uplift” hypothesis is not supported when the heterogeneous diversification histories among these lizards is considered. We use the Liolaemidae as an ideal system to demonstrate potential risks of ignoring clade‐specific differences in diversification patterns in macroevolutionary studies. We also implemented simulations to show that, in agreement with previous findings, the HiSSE approach can effectively and substantially reduce the level of distribution‐dependent models receiving the highest AIC weights in such scenarios. However, we still find a relatively high rate (15%) of distribution‐dependent models receiving the highest AIC weights, and provide recommendations related to the set of models included in the analyses that reduce these rates by half. Finally, we demonstrate that trees including clades following different dependent‐drivers affect RPANDA analyses by producing different outcomes, ranging from partially correct models to completely misleading results. We provide recommendations for the implementation of both programs.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie

Schlagwörter

Andes, biogeography, extinction, GeoHiSSE, GeoSSE, hidden states, macroevolution, RPANDA, speciation

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690OLAVE, Melisa, Luciano J. AVILA, Jack W. SITES, Mariana MORANDO, 2020. How important is it to consider lineage diversification heterogeneity in macroevolutionary studies? : Lessons from the lizard family Liolaemidae. In: Journal of Biogeography. Wiley. 2020, 47(6), pp. 1286-1297. ISSN 0305-0270. eISSN 1365-2699. Available under: doi: 10.1111/jbi.13807
BibTex
@article{Olave2020-06impor-48153,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1111/jbi.13807},
  title={How important is it to consider lineage diversification heterogeneity in macroevolutionary studies? : Lessons from the lizard family Liolaemidae},
  number={6},
  volume={47},
  issn={0305-0270},
  journal={Journal of Biogeography},
  pages={1286--1297},
  author={Olave, Melisa and Avila, Luciano J. and Sites, Jack W. and Morando, Mariana}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/48153">
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Sites, Jack W.</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Morando, Mariana</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dcterms:title>How important is it to consider lineage diversification heterogeneity in macroevolutionary studies? : Lessons from the lizard family Liolaemidae</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Olave, Melisa</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2020-06</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Avila, Luciano J.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Avila, Luciano J.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-01-07T12:00:06Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Olave, Melisa</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Sites, Jack W.</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/48153"/>
    <dc:creator>Morando, Mariana</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/48153/1/Olave_2-1l6lrruughyy36.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-01-07T12:00:06Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dcterms:abstract>Macroevolutionary and biogeographical studies commonly apply multiple models to test state‐dependent diversification. These models track the association between states of interest along a phylogeny, although many of them do not consider whether different clades might be evolving under different evolutionary drivers. Yet, they are still commonly applied to empirical studies without careful consideration of possible lineage diversification heterogeneity along the phylogenetic tree. A recent biogeographic study has suggested that orogenic uplift of the southern Andes has acted as a species pump, driving diversification of the lizard family Liolaemidae (307 described species), native to temperate southern South America. Here, we argue against the Andean uplift as main driver of evolution in this group. We show that there is a clear pattern of heterogeneous diversification in the Liolaemidae, which biases state‐ and environment‐dependent analyses in, respectively, the GeoSSE and RPANDA programs. We show here that there are two shifts to accelerated speciation rates involving two clades that have both been classified as having “Andean” distributions. We incorporated the Geographic Hidden‐State Speciation and Extinction model (GeoHiSSE) to accommodate unrelated diversification shifts, and also re‐analyzed the data in RPANDA program after splitting biologically distinct clades for separate analyses, as well as including a more appropriate set of models. We demonstrate that the “Andean uplift” hypothesis is not supported when the heterogeneous diversification histories among these lizards is considered. We use the Liolaemidae as an ideal system to demonstrate potential risks of ignoring clade‐specific differences in diversification patterns in macroevolutionary studies. We also implemented simulations to show that, in agreement with previous findings, the HiSSE approach can effectively and substantially reduce the level of distribution‐dependent models receiving the highest AIC weights in such scenarios. However, we still find a relatively high rate (15%) of distribution‐dependent models receiving the highest AIC weights, and provide recommendations related to the set of models included in the analyses that reduce these rates by half. Finally, we demonstrate that trees including clades following different dependent‐drivers affect RPANDA analyses by producing different outcomes, ranging from partially correct models to completely misleading results. We provide recommendations for the implementation of both programs.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/48153/1/Olave_2-1l6lrruughyy36.pdf"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen