Publikation: Strong Reflexivity and Its Critics : Responses to Autoethnography in the German-Speaking Cultural and Social Sciences
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This contribution explores autoethnography as a strongly reflexive approach to qualitative research and its reception in German-speaking sociology and cultural anthropology. Over recent years, our academic communities have developed an increased interest in autoethnography, although many reactions range from critical to hostile: It is accused of solipsism, narcissism, lack of arguments and theory, affective immediacy, non-criticizability, endorsement of neoliberal politics, a threat to disciplinary identity, and a strategic mistake in the fight for appreciation of qualitative research. We discuss each point of criticism and translate our insights into more general considerations on strong reflexivity in German-speaking cultural and social sciences.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
PLODER, Andrea, Johanna STADLBAUER, 2016. Strong Reflexivity and Its Critics : Responses to Autoethnography in the German-Speaking Cultural and Social Sciences. In: Qualitative Inquiry. Sage Publications. 2016, 22(9), pp. 753-765. ISSN 1077-8004. eISSN 1552-7565. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1077800416658067BibTex
@article{Ploder2016Stron-53369,
year={2016},
doi={10.1177/1077800416658067},
title={Strong Reflexivity and Its Critics : Responses to Autoethnography in the German-Speaking Cultural and Social Sciences},
number={9},
volume={22},
issn={1077-8004},
journal={Qualitative Inquiry},
pages={753--765},
author={Ploder, Andrea and Stadlbauer, Johanna}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/53369">
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53369/3/Ploder_2-1l6z874tcj2sv5.pdf"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53369/3/Ploder_2-1l6z874tcj2sv5.pdf"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:contributor>Stadlbauer, Johanna</dc:contributor>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
<dcterms:issued>2016</dcterms:issued>
<dc:creator>Ploder, Andrea</dc:creator>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/53369"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-04-12T09:14:15Z</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Ploder, Andrea</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-04-12T09:14:15Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dcterms:title>Strong Reflexivity and Its Critics : Responses to Autoethnography in the German-Speaking Cultural and Social Sciences</dcterms:title>
<dc:creator>Stadlbauer, Johanna</dc:creator>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This contribution explores autoethnography as a strongly reflexive approach to qualitative research and its reception in German-speaking sociology and cultural anthropology. Over recent years, our academic communities have developed an increased interest in autoethnography, although many reactions range from critical to hostile: It is accused of solipsism, narcissism, lack of arguments and theory, affective immediacy, non-criticizability, endorsement of neoliberal politics, a threat to disciplinary identity, and a strategic mistake in the fight for appreciation of qualitative research. We discuss each point of criticism and translate our insights into more general considerations on strong reflexivity in German-speaking cultural and social sciences.</dcterms:abstract>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>