US regulations to curb alleged cancer causes are ineffectual and compromised by scientific, constitutional and ethical violations

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Gori_2-1n6jbz538rmy91.pdf
Gori_2-1n6jbz538rmy91.pdfGröße: 664.82 KBDownloads: 4
Datum
2023
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung

The 1958 Delaney amendment to the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetics Act prohibited food additives causing cancer in animals by appropriate tests. Regulators responded by adopting chronic lifetime cancer tests in rodents, soon challenged as inappropriate, for they led to very inconsistent results depending on the subjective choice of animals, test design and conduct, and interpretive assumptions. Presently, decades of discussions and trials have come to conclude it is impossible to translate chronic animal data into verifiable prospects of cancer hazards and risks in humans. Such conclusion poses an existential crisis for official agencies in the US and abroad, which for some 65 years have used animal tests to justify massive regulations of alleged human cancer hazards, with aggregated costs of $trillions and without provable evidence of public health advantages. This article addresses suitable remedies for the US and potentially worldwide, by critically exploring the practices of regulatory agencies vis-á-vis essential criteria for validating scientific evidence. According to this analysis, regulations of alleged cancer hazards and risks have been and continue to be structured around arbitrary default assumptions at odds with basic scientific and legal tests of reliable evidence. Such practices raise a manifold ethical predicament for being incompatible with basic premises of the US Constitution, and with the ensuing public expectations of testable truth and transparency from government agencies. Potential remedies in the US include amendments to the US Administrative Procedures Act, preferably requiring agencies to justify regulations compliant with the Daubert opinion of the Daubert ruling of the US Supreme Court, which codifies the criteria defining reliable scientific evidence. International reverberations are bound to follow what remedial actions may be taken in the US, the origin of current world regulatory procedures to control alleged cancer causing agents.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie
Schlagwörter
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690GORI, Gio B., Michael ASCHNER, Christopher J. BORGERT, Samuel M. COHEN, Daniel R. DIETRICH, Corrado L. GALLI, Helmut GREIM, John S. HESLOP-HARRISON, Sam KACEW, Norbert E. KAMINSKI, 2023. US regulations to curb alleged cancer causes are ineffectual and compromised by scientific, constitutional and ethical violations. In: Archives of Toxicology. Springer. 2023, 97(6), pp. 1813-1822. ISSN 0370-8497. eISSN 1432-0738. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s00204-022-03429-5
BibTex
@article{Gori2023-04-08regul-66559,
  year={2023},
  doi={10.1007/s00204-022-03429-5},
  title={US regulations to curb alleged cancer causes are ineffectual and compromised by scientific, constitutional and ethical violations},
  number={6},
  volume={97},
  issn={0370-8497},
  journal={Archives of Toxicology},
  pages={1813--1822},
  author={Gori, Gio B. and Aschner, Michael and Borgert, Christopher J. and Cohen, Samuel M. and Dietrich, Daniel R. and Galli, Corrado L. and Greim, Helmut and Heslop-Harrison, John S. and Kacew, Sam and Kaminski, Norbert E.}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/66559">
    <dc:contributor>Kaminski, Norbert E.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Gori, Gio B.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Aschner, Michael</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/66559"/>
    <dc:contributor>Galli, Corrado L.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Borgert, Christopher J.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Galli, Corrado L.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-04-12T12:50:27Z</dcterms:available>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Borgert, Christopher J.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Greim, Helmut</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Heslop-Harrison, John S.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-04-12T12:50:27Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:contributor>Heslop-Harrison, John S.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Kaminski, Norbert E.</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66559/1/Gori_2-1n6jbz538rmy91.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2023-04-08</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Kacew, Sam</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Kacew, Sam</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Gori, Gio B.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>US regulations to curb alleged cancer causes are ineffectual and compromised by scientific, constitutional and ethical violations</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Cohen, Samuel M.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Dietrich, Daniel R.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Greim, Helmut</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Dietrich, Daniel R.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract>The 1958 Delaney amendment to the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetics Act prohibited food additives causing cancer in animals by appropriate tests. Regulators responded by adopting chronic lifetime cancer tests in rodents, soon challenged as inappropriate, for they led to very inconsistent results depending on the subjective choice of animals, test design and conduct, and interpretive assumptions. Presently, decades of discussions and trials have come to conclude it is impossible to translate chronic animal data into verifiable prospects of cancer hazards and risks in humans. Such conclusion poses an existential crisis for official agencies in the US and abroad, which for some 65 years have used animal tests to justify massive regulations of alleged human cancer hazards, with aggregated costs of $trillions and without provable evidence of public health advantages. This article addresses suitable remedies for the US and potentially worldwide, by critically exploring the practices of regulatory agencies vis-á-vis essential criteria for validating scientific evidence. According to this analysis, regulations of alleged cancer hazards and risks have been and continue to be structured around arbitrary default assumptions at odds with basic scientific and legal tests of reliable evidence. Such practices raise a manifold ethical predicament for being incompatible with basic premises of the US Constitution, and with the ensuing public expectations of testable truth and transparency from government agencies. Potential remedies in the US include amendments to the US Administrative Procedures Act, preferably requiring agencies to justify regulations compliant with the Daubert opinion of the Daubert ruling of the US Supreme Court, which codifies the criteria defining reliable scientific evidence. International reverberations are bound to follow what remedial actions may be taken in the US, the origin of current world regulatory procedures to control alleged cancer causing agents.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Aschner, Michael</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Cohen, Samuel M.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66559/1/Gori_2-1n6jbz538rmy91.pdf"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen