Publikation: Compassione, doveri verso se stessi ed etica animale nella teoria kantiana
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
According to Immanuel Kant, humans have moral obligations only to other human beings or to themselves. However, when we treat animals in a violent and cruel way, we weaken our ability to feel compassion – a crucial natural disposition in our moral life – and gradually eradicate it completely. Respect for animal sensitivity and gratitude towards animals for assistance in carrying out strenuous work for us are, first of all, perfect duties to ourselves and, secondly, indirect duties “regarding animals”. In my paper, I will analyse the systematic connection between compassion and existence of duties to the self. Against the traditional interpretation of Kant’s argument for indirect duties regarding animals, I will argue that for Kant indirect duties are not less binding then direct ones and that sympathetic feelings and compassion play a much more important role in his ethics then traditionally acknowledged.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BASAGLIA, Federica, 2017. Compassione, doveri verso se stessi ed etica animale nella teoria kantiana. In: I castelli di Yale Online. Dipartimento di Scienze Umane, Università degli Studi di Ferrara. 2017, V(2), pp. 409-430. eISSN 2282-5460. Available under: doi: 10.15160/2282-5460/1548BibTex
@article{Basaglia2017Compa-56389, year={2017}, doi={10.15160/2282-5460/1548}, title={Compassione, doveri verso se stessi ed etica animale nella teoria kantiana}, number={2}, volume={V}, journal={I castelli di Yale Online}, pages={409--430}, author={Basaglia, Federica} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/56389"> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-01-28T14:46:08Z</dc:date> <dc:language>ita</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Basaglia, Federica</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/56389"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-01-28T14:46:08Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:title>Compassione, doveri verso se stessi ed etica animale nella teoria kantiana</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="ita">According to Immanuel Kant, humans have moral obligations only to other human beings or to themselves. However, when we treat animals in a violent and cruel way, we weaken our ability to feel compassion – a crucial natural disposition in our moral life – and gradually eradicate it completely. Respect for animal sensitivity and gratitude towards animals for assistance in carrying out strenuous work for us are, first of all, perfect duties to ourselves and, secondly, indirect duties “regarding animals”. In my paper, I will analyse the systematic connection between compassion and existence of duties to the self. Against the traditional interpretation of Kant’s argument for indirect duties regarding animals, I will argue that for Kant indirect duties are not less binding then direct ones and that sympathetic feelings and compassion play a much more important role in his ethics then traditionally acknowledged.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:creator>Basaglia, Federica</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>