Publikation: Differential potencies of effector genes in adult Drosophila
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
The GAL4/UAS gene expression system in Drosophila has been crucial in revealing the behavioral significance of neural circuits. Transgene products that block neurotransmitter release and induce cell death have been proved to inhibit neural function powerfully. Here we compare the action of the five effector genes shibirets1, Tetanus toxin light chain (TNT), reaper, Diphtheria toxin A-chain (DTA), and inwardly rectifying potassium channel (Kir2.1) and show differences in their efficiency depending on the target cells and the timing of induction. Specifically, effectors blocking neuronal transmission or excitability led to adultinduced paralysis more efficiently than those causing cell ablation. We contrasted these differential potencies in adult to their actions during development. Furthermore, we induced TNT expression in the adult mushroom bodies. In contrast to the successful impairment in short-term olfactory memory by shibirets1, adult TNT expression in the same set of cells did not lead to any obvious impairment. Altogether, the efficiency of effector genes depends on properties of the targeted neurons. Thus, we conclude that the selection of the appropriate effector gene is critical for evaluating the function of neural circuits.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
THUM, Andreas, Stephan KNAPEK, Jens RISTER, Eva DIERICHS-SCHMITT, Martin HEISENBERG, Hiromu TANIMOTO, 2006. Differential potencies of effector genes in adult Drosophila. In: The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2006, 498(2), pp. 194-203. ISSN 0021-9967. Available under: doi: 10.1002/cne.21022BibTex
@article{Thum2006-09-10Diffe-17146, year={2006}, doi={10.1002/cne.21022}, title={Differential potencies of effector genes in adult Drosophila}, number={2}, volume={498}, issn={0021-9967}, journal={The Journal of Comparative Neurology}, pages={194--203}, author={Thum, Andreas and Knapek, Stephan and Rister, Jens and Dierichs-Schmitt, Eva and Heisenberg, Martin and Tanimoto, Hiromu} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/17146"> <dc:creator>Thum, Andreas</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <dcterms:issued>2006-09-10</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-11-29T12:43:13Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Heisenberg, Martin</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Rister, Jens</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Thum, Andreas</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Rister, Jens</dc:creator> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Knapek, Stephan</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <dc:creator>Dierichs-Schmitt, Eva</dc:creator> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: The Journal of Comparative Neurology ; 498 (2006), 2. - S.194-203</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:title>Differential potencies of effector genes in adult Drosophila</dcterms:title> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/17146/2/Thum%20etal.pdf"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Tanimoto, Hiromu</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Tanimoto, Hiromu</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/17146/2/Thum%20etal.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Heisenberg, Martin</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/17146"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-11-29T12:43:13Z</dc:date> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The GAL4/UAS gene expression system in Drosophila has been crucial in revealing the behavioral significance of neural circuits. Transgene products that block neurotransmitter release and induce cell death have been proved to inhibit neural function powerfully. Here we compare the action of the five effector genes shibire<sup>ts1</sup>, Tetanus toxin light chain (TNT), reaper, Diphtheria toxin A-chain (DTA), and inwardly rectifying potassium channel (Kir2.1) and show differences in their efficiency depending on the target cells and the timing of induction. Specifically, effectors blocking neuronal transmission or excitability led to adultinduced paralysis more efficiently than those causing cell ablation. We contrasted these differential potencies in adult to their actions during development. Furthermore, we induced TNT expression in the adult mushroom bodies. In contrast to the successful impairment in short-term olfactory memory by shibire<sup>ts1</sup>, adult TNT expression in the same set of cells did not lead to any obvious impairment. Altogether, the efficiency of effector genes depends on properties of the targeted neurons. Thus, we conclude that the selection of the appropriate effector gene is critical for evaluating the function of neural circuits.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Dierichs-Schmitt, Eva</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Knapek, Stephan</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>