Publikation: La collocazione sistematica dei doveri perfetti verso sé stessi nella tassonomia della Metaphysik der Sitten
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
According to what Kant writes in the Introduction to the Doctrine of Virtue, all duties of virtue are imperfect duties, whereas perfect duties can be only duties of right. In the text of the Doctrine of Virtue, on the other hand, he presents several perfect duties to the self as belonging to the duties of virtue. Therefore, the question arises whether duties to the self (as perfect duties) should actually not be discussed in the Doctrine or Virtue, or whether they (as duties of virtue) should rather be considered imperfect duties. My contribution tries to support a particular tentative solution of this problem, also recurring to reflections we find in the Preliminary Works on the Doctrine of Virtue.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BASAGLIA, Federica, 2020. La collocazione sistematica dei doveri perfetti verso sé stessi nella tassonomia della Metaphysik der Sitten. In: FANTASIA, Francesca, ed., Carmelo Alessio MELI, ed.. Ragione ed effettività nella tarda filosofia di Kant : Libertà e doveri alla luce dei "lose Blätter" e dei testi a stampa. Madrid: Ediciones Alamanda, 2020, pp. 217-236. ISBN 9788494943652BibTex
@incollection{Basaglia2020collo-53165, year={2020}, title={La collocazione sistematica dei doveri perfetti verso sé stessi nella tassonomia della Metaphysik der Sitten}, isbn={9788494943652}, publisher={Ediciones Alamanda}, address={Madrid}, booktitle={Ragione ed effettività nella tarda filosofia di Kant : Libertà e doveri alla luce dei "lose Blätter" e dei testi a stampa}, pages={217--236}, editor={Fantasia, Francesca and Meli, Carmelo Alessio}, author={Basaglia, Federica} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/53165"> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-03-17T12:18:38Z</dcterms:available> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/53165"/> <dc:creator>Basaglia, Federica</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>La collocazione sistematica dei doveri perfetti verso sé stessi nella tassonomia della Metaphysik der Sitten</dcterms:title> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-03-17T12:18:38Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Basaglia, Federica</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="ita">According to what Kant writes in the Introduction to the Doctrine of Virtue, all duties of virtue are imperfect duties, whereas perfect duties can be only duties of right. In the text of the Doctrine of Virtue, on the other hand, he presents several perfect duties to the self as belonging to the duties of virtue. Therefore, the question arises whether duties to the self (as perfect duties) should actually not be discussed in the Doctrine or Virtue, or whether they (as duties of virtue) should rather be considered imperfect duties. My contribution tries to support a particular tentative solution of this problem, also recurring to reflections we find in the Preliminary Works on the Doctrine of Virtue.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:language>ita</dc:language> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>