Publikation: (Ad-)ventures in faith : a critique of Bishop's doxastic-venture model
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2015
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Religious Studies. 2015, 51(04), pp. 513-529. ISSN 0034-4125. eISSN 1469-901X. Available under: doi: 10.1017/S003441251400047X
Zusammenfassung
While some philosophical models reduce religious faith to either mere belief or affect, more recent accounts have begun to look at the volitional component of faith. In this spirit, John Bishop has defended the notion of faith as a ‘doxastic venture’. In this article, I consider Bishop's view in detail and attempt to show that his account proves on the one hand too permissive and on the other too restrictive. Thus, although the doxastic-venture model offers certain advantages over other prominent views in the philosophy of religion, it still falls short of providing us with an ultimately satisfactory account of religious faith.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
faith, belief, doxastic venture, self-deception
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
GRIFFIOEN, Amber L., 2015. (Ad-)ventures in faith : a critique of Bishop's doxastic-venture model. In: Religious Studies. 2015, 51(04), pp. 513-529. ISSN 0034-4125. eISSN 1469-901X. Available under: doi: 10.1017/S003441251400047XBibTex
@article{Griffioen2015-12Adven-30671,
year={2015},
doi={10.1017/S003441251400047X},
title={(Ad-)ventures in faith : a critique of Bishop's doxastic-venture model},
number={04},
volume={51},
issn={0034-4125},
journal={Religious Studies},
pages={513--529},
author={Griffioen, Amber L.}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30671">
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/30671"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30671/3/Griffioen_0-284635.pdf"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-04-07T09:11:07Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-04-07T09:11:07Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:issued>2015-12</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30671/3/Griffioen_0-284635.pdf"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Griffioen, Amber L.</dc:creator>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:title>(Ad-)ventures in faith : a critique of Bishop's doxastic-venture model</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">While some philosophical models reduce religious faith to either mere belief or affect, more recent accounts have begun to look at the volitional component of faith. In this spirit, John Bishop has defended the notion of faith as a ‘doxastic venture’. In this article, I consider Bishop's view in detail and attempt to show that his account proves on the one hand too permissive and on the other too restrictive. Thus, although the doxastic-venture model offers certain advantages over other prominent views in the philosophy of religion, it still falls short of providing us with an ultimately satisfactory account of religious faith.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:contributor>Griffioen, Amber L.</dc:contributor>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
