Publikation: Islam and democracy
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2012
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Public Choice. Springer. 2012, 151(1-2), pp. 185-192. ISSN 0048-5829. eISSN 1573-7101. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11127-010-9741-3
Zusammenfassung
Using the POLITY IV and Freedom House indices, Rowley and Smith (Public Choice 139(3–4):273, 2009) found that countries with Muslim majorities enjoy less freedom and are less democratic than countries in which Muslims are a minority. Because the POLITY IV and Freedom House indices have been criticized on several grounds, I reinvestigate Rowley and Smith’s finding using the new Democracy-Dictatorship data from Cheibub et al. (Public Choice 143(1–2):67, 2010). The empirical results confirm that countries with Muslim majorities are indeed less likely to be democratic.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
330 Wirtschaft
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
POTRAFKE, Niklas, 2012. Islam and democracy. In: Public Choice. Springer. 2012, 151(1-2), pp. 185-192. ISSN 0048-5829. eISSN 1573-7101. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11127-010-9741-3BibTex
@article{Potrafke2012-04Islam-49155,
year={2012},
doi={10.1007/s11127-010-9741-3},
title={Islam and democracy},
number={1-2},
volume={151},
issn={0048-5829},
journal={Public Choice},
pages={185--192},
author={Potrafke, Niklas}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/49155">
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Potrafke, Niklas</dc:creator>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-03-27T10:30:01Z</dc:date>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/49155"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Using the POLITY IV and Freedom House indices, Rowley and Smith (Public Choice 139(3–4):273, 2009) found that countries with Muslim majorities enjoy less freedom and are less democratic than countries in which Muslims are a minority. Because the POLITY IV and Freedom House indices have been criticized on several grounds, I reinvestigate Rowley and Smith’s finding using the new Democracy-Dictatorship data from Cheibub et al. (Public Choice 143(1–2):67, 2010). The empirical results confirm that countries with Muslim majorities are indeed less likely to be democratic.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-03-27T10:30:01Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:issued>2012-04</dcterms:issued>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:contributor>Potrafke, Niklas</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:title>Islam and democracy</dcterms:title>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
