Publikation: The Scope of Application of the UCP Directive : "I Know What You Did Last Summer"
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
The ECJ judgments VTB-VAB and Plus have simultaneously made clear how far Directive 2005/29 on unfair commercial practices in the Internal Market (hereinafter: UCP Directive) is going to bear upon the future market conduct of market participants and raised the question of whether its scope of application, if defined in such a comprehensive manner, is covered by its purpose. Following an introduction (I.), this paper will first try to shed light on the UCP Directive's provisions relating to the scope of application and on the problems relating to them (II.). Then it will critically analyse the VTB judgement (III.), before explaining the lessons learnt (IV.). The recent judgements have left unanswered, on the one hand, questions relating to the treatment of after-sale conduct without market effects and, on the other, practices with such market effects engaged in by science, consumer associations or media. They will be discussed (V.). Finally, the results will be summarised (VI.).
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
GLÖCKNER, Jochen, 2010. The Scope of Application of the UCP Directive : "I Know What You Did Last Summer". In: International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (IIC). 2010, 41(5), pp. 570-592BibTex
@article{Glockner2010Scope-13416,
year={2010},
title={The Scope of Application of the UCP Directive : "I Know What You Did Last Summer"},
number={5},
volume={41},
journal={International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (IIC)},
pages={570--592},
author={Glöckner, Jochen}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/13416">
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (IIC) ; 41 (2010), 5. - pp. 570-592</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-09-22T10:58:24Z</dc:date>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/13416"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:contributor>Glöckner, Jochen</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:title>The Scope of Application of the UCP Directive : "I Know What You Did Last Summer"</dcterms:title>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
<dc:creator>Glöckner, Jochen</dc:creator>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The ECJ judgments VTB-VAB and Plus have simultaneously made clear how far Directive 2005/29 on unfair commercial practices in the Internal Market (hereinafter: UCP Directive) is going to bear upon the future market conduct of market participants and raised the question of whether its scope of application, if defined in such a comprehensive manner, is covered by its purpose. Following an introduction (I.), this paper will first try to shed light on the UCP Directive's provisions relating to the scope of application and on the problems relating to them (II.). Then it will critically analyse the VTB judgement (III.), before explaining the lessons learnt (IV.). The recent judgements have left unanswered, on the one hand, questions relating to the treatment of after-sale conduct without market effects and, on the other, practices with such market effects engaged in by science, consumer associations or media. They will be discussed (V.). Finally, the results will be summarised (VI.).</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-09-22T10:58:24Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
