Publikation: Bolzano's Concept of Grounding (Abfolge) against the Background of Normal Proofs
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
In this paper, I provide a thorough discussion and reconstruction of Bernard Bolzano’s theory of grounding and a detailed investigation into the parallels between his concept of grounding and current notions of normal proofs. Grounding (Abfolge) is an objective ground-consequence relation among true propositions that is explanatory in nature. The grounding relation plays a crucial role in Bolzano’s proof-theory, and it is essential for his views on the ideal buildup of scientific theories. Occasionally, similarities have been pointed out between Bolzano’s ideas on grounding and cut-free proofs in Gentzen’s sequent calculus. My thesis is, however, that they bear an even stronger resemblance to the normal natural deduction proofs employed in proof-theoretic semantics in the tradition of Dummett and Prawitz.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
RUMBERG, Antje, 2013. Bolzano's Concept of Grounding (Abfolge) against the Background of Normal Proofs. In: The Review of Symbolic Logic. 2013, 6(03), pp. 424-459. ISSN 1755-0203. eISSN 1755-0211. Available under: doi: 10.1017/S1755020313000154BibTex
@article{Rumberg2013Bolza-26629, year={2013}, doi={10.1017/S1755020313000154}, title={Bolzano's Concept of Grounding (Abfolge) against the Background of Normal Proofs}, number={03}, volume={6}, issn={1755-0203}, journal={The Review of Symbolic Logic}, pages={424--459}, author={Rumberg, Antje} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/26629"> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In this paper, I provide a thorough discussion and reconstruction of Bernard Bolzano’s theory of grounding and a detailed investigation into the parallels between his concept of grounding and current notions of normal proofs. Grounding (Abfolge) is an objective ground-consequence relation among true propositions that is explanatory in nature. The grounding relation plays a crucial role in Bolzano’s proof-theory, and it is essential for his views on the ideal buildup of scientific theories. Occasionally, similarities have been pointed out between Bolzano’s ideas on grounding and cut-free proofs in Gentzen’s sequent calculus. My thesis is, however, that they bear an even stronger resemblance to the normal natural deduction proofs employed in proof-theoretic semantics in the tradition of Dummett and Prawitz.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Rumberg, Antje</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/26629"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:title>Bolzano's Concept of Grounding (Abfolge) against the Background of Normal Proofs</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-04T10:29:42Z</dc:date> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-04T10:29:42Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>The Review of Symbolic Logic ; 6 (2013), 3. - S. 424-459</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:creator>Rumberg, Antje</dc:creator> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>