Publikation: Indicators for quality of life and working life in Germany and Japan : a culture-psychological perspective
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
The 10th meeting of the German-Japanese Society for the Social Sciences in Osnabrück, August 2008, ended in 4 questions summarized by György Széll.
These questions were:
1. How would you define quality of life and working life?
2. Which are according to your oppinion the main differences between Germany and Japan in this respect?
3. Art there universal criteria in order to compare quality of life and working life?
4. How do you evaluate international comparative rankings and monitoring in order to improve the quality of life and working life?
Dealing with these questions opens the perspective to several further questions, wihich obviously cannot be answered without some knowledge on social, cultural, political, economic and psychological theories and empirical findings. That is one of the main reason , why German and Japanese social suggestions to deal with these questions are presented from a culture-psychological perspective.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
TROMMSDORFF, Gisela, 2009. Indicators for quality of life and working life in Germany and Japan : a culture-psychological perspective. In: SZÉLL, G., ed., D. EHRIG, ed., U. STAROSKE, ed., U. SZÉLL, ed.. Quality of life and working life in comparison. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang, 2009, pp. 371-385BibTex
@incollection{Trommsdorff2009Indic-10718, year={2009}, title={Indicators for quality of life and working life in Germany and Japan : a culture-psychological perspective}, publisher={Lang}, address={Frankfurt a.M.}, booktitle={Quality of life and working life in comparison}, pages={371--385}, editor={Széll, G. and Ehrig, D. and Staroske, U. and Széll, U.}, author={Trommsdorff, Gisela} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/10718"> <dc:creator>Trommsdorff, Gisela</dc:creator> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Quality of life and working life in comparison / G. Széll, D. Ehrig, U. Staroske, & U. Széll (eds.). Frankfurt a.M.: Lang, 2009, pp. 371-385</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:21:26Z</dcterms:available> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Trommsdorff, Gisela</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2009</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/10718"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10718/1/Indicators_for_quality_of_life_and_working_life_2009_KOPS9060.pdf"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The 10th meeting of the German-Japanese Society for the Social Sciences in Osnabrück, August 2008, ended in 4 questions summarized by György Széll.<br />These questions were:<br />1. How would you define quality of life and working life?<br />2. Which are according to your oppinion the main differences between Germany and Japan in this respect?<br />3. Art there universal criteria in order to compare quality of life and working life?<br />4. How do you evaluate international comparative rankings and monitoring in order to improve the quality of life and working life?<br />Dealing with these questions opens the perspective to several further questions, wihich obviously cannot be answered without some knowledge on social, cultural, political, economic and psychological theories and empirical findings. That is one of the main reason , why German and Japanese social suggestions to deal with these questions are presented from a culture-psychological perspective.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10718/1/Indicators_for_quality_of_life_and_working_life_2009_KOPS9060.pdf"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:21:26Z</dc:date> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:title>Indicators for quality of life and working life in Germany and Japan : a culture-psychological perspective</dcterms:title> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>