Publikation:

Counterfactual Hypothetical vs. Biscuit Conditionals : A Semantic/Pragmatic Analysis of Their Morphological Differences

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2023

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

KAUFMANN, Stefan, ed., David E. OVER, ed., Ghanshyam SHARMA, ed.. Conditionals : Logic, Linguistics and Psychology. 1st edition. Cham: Springer, 2023, pp. 425-458. ISBN 978-3-031-05681-9. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-05682-6_14

Zusammenfassung

A uniform syntactic and semantic analysis for indicative hypothetical conditionals like If you are hungry, your stomach is growling and biscuit conditionals like If you are hungry, there is pizza in the fridge has been argued for at least since Franke (2009). This is aided by their morphological make-up, in particular with respect to tense and mood. However, when considering their counterfactual versions, If you were hungry, your stomach would be growling and If you were hungry, there is pizza in the fridge respectively, the two forms differ, which posits a challenge to the uniform approach. We argue that such an approach can be maintained by taking two ideas into account: It is possible to break Sequence of Tense and Mood (as in counterfactual biscuits), and certain forms (namely hypothetical counterfactuals with broken Sequence of Tense and Mood and biscuit counterfactuals with Sequence of Tense and Mood) are prevented from appearing by pragmatic mechanisms such as competition between weaker and stronger forms and the Gricean Principle of Manner.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik

Schlagwörter

Conditionals, Biscuit conditionals, Counterfactual, Mood, Tense, Fake tense, Sequence of tense, Double access, Pragmatic competition, Principle of Manner

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690CSIPAK, Eva, Maribel ROMERO, 2023. Counterfactual Hypothetical vs. Biscuit Conditionals : A Semantic/Pragmatic Analysis of Their Morphological Differences. In: KAUFMANN, Stefan, ed., David E. OVER, ed., Ghanshyam SHARMA, ed.. Conditionals : Logic, Linguistics and Psychology. 1st edition. Cham: Springer, 2023, pp. 425-458. ISBN 978-3-031-05681-9. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-05682-6_14
BibTex
@incollection{Csipak2023Count-66885,
  year={2023},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-031-05682-6_14},
  title={Counterfactual Hypothetical vs. Biscuit Conditionals : A Semantic/Pragmatic Analysis of Their Morphological Differences},
  edition={1st edition},
  isbn={978-3-031-05681-9},
  publisher={Springer},
  address={Cham},
  booktitle={Conditionals : Logic, Linguistics and Psychology},
  pages={425--458},
  editor={Kaufmann, Stefan and Over, David E. and Sharma, Ghanshyam},
  author={Csipak, Eva and Romero, Maribel}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/66885">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-05-12T09:23:28Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/66885"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Romero, Maribel</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Romero, Maribel</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Csipak, Eva</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:creator>Csipak, Eva</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract>A uniform syntactic and semantic analysis for indicative hypothetical conditionals like If you are hungry, your stomach is growling and biscuit conditionals like If you are hungry, there is pizza in the fridge has been argued for at least since Franke (2009). This is aided by their morphological make-up, in particular with respect to tense and mood. However, when considering their counterfactual versions, If you were hungry, your stomach would be growling and If you were hungry, there is pizza in the fridge respectively, the two forms differ, which posits a challenge to the uniform approach. We argue that such an approach can be maintained by taking two ideas into account: It is possible to break Sequence of Tense and Mood (as in counterfactual biscuits), and certain forms (namely hypothetical counterfactuals with broken Sequence of Tense and Mood and biscuit counterfactuals with Sequence of Tense and Mood) are prevented from appearing by pragmatic mechanisms such as competition between weaker and stronger forms and the Gricean Principle of Manner.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-05-12T09:23:28Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dcterms:title>Counterfactual Hypothetical vs. Biscuit Conditionals : A Semantic/Pragmatic Analysis of Their Morphological Differences</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen