Publikation: Counterfactual Hypothetical vs. Biscuit Conditionals : A Semantic/Pragmatic Analysis of Their Morphological Differences
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
A uniform syntactic and semantic analysis for indicative hypothetical conditionals like If you are hungry, your stomach is growling and biscuit conditionals like If you are hungry, there is pizza in the fridge has been argued for at least since Franke (2009). This is aided by their morphological make-up, in particular with respect to tense and mood. However, when considering their counterfactual versions, If you were hungry, your stomach would be growling and If you were hungry, there is pizza in the fridge respectively, the two forms differ, which posits a challenge to the uniform approach. We argue that such an approach can be maintained by taking two ideas into account: It is possible to break Sequence of Tense and Mood (as in counterfactual biscuits), and certain forms (namely hypothetical counterfactuals with broken Sequence of Tense and Mood and biscuit counterfactuals with Sequence of Tense and Mood) are prevented from appearing by pragmatic mechanisms such as competition between weaker and stronger forms and the Gricean Principle of Manner.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
CSIPAK, Eva, Maribel ROMERO, 2023. Counterfactual Hypothetical vs. Biscuit Conditionals : A Semantic/Pragmatic Analysis of Their Morphological Differences. In: KAUFMANN, Stefan, ed., David E. OVER, ed., Ghanshyam SHARMA, ed.. Conditionals : Logic, Linguistics and Psychology. 1st edition. Cham: Springer, 2023, pp. 425-458. ISBN 978-3-031-05681-9. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-05682-6_14BibTex
@incollection{Csipak2023Count-66885, year={2023}, doi={10.1007/978-3-031-05682-6_14}, title={Counterfactual Hypothetical vs. Biscuit Conditionals : A Semantic/Pragmatic Analysis of Their Morphological Differences}, edition={1st edition}, isbn={978-3-031-05681-9}, publisher={Springer}, address={Cham}, booktitle={Conditionals : Logic, Linguistics and Psychology}, pages={425--458}, editor={Kaufmann, Stefan and Over, David E. and Sharma, Ghanshyam}, author={Csipak, Eva and Romero, Maribel} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/66885"> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-05-12T09:23:28Z</dc:date> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/66885"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Romero, Maribel</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Romero, Maribel</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Csipak, Eva</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dc:creator>Csipak, Eva</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract>A uniform syntactic and semantic analysis for indicative hypothetical conditionals like If you are hungry, your stomach is growling and biscuit conditionals like If you are hungry, there is pizza in the fridge has been argued for at least since Franke (2009). This is aided by their morphological make-up, in particular with respect to tense and mood. However, when considering their counterfactual versions, If you were hungry, your stomach would be growling and If you were hungry, there is pizza in the fridge respectively, the two forms differ, which posits a challenge to the uniform approach. We argue that such an approach can be maintained by taking two ideas into account: It is possible to break Sequence of Tense and Mood (as in counterfactual biscuits), and certain forms (namely hypothetical counterfactuals with broken Sequence of Tense and Mood and biscuit counterfactuals with Sequence of Tense and Mood) are prevented from appearing by pragmatic mechanisms such as competition between weaker and stronger forms and the Gricean Principle of Manner.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-05-12T09:23:28Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:title>Counterfactual Hypothetical vs. Biscuit Conditionals : A Semantic/Pragmatic Analysis of Their Morphological Differences</dcterms:title> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>